2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of chemistry transport models over India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
76
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
10
76
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation with monthly varying emissions compares slightly better with observations compared to the baseline simulation but still underestimates BC (NMBF = −2.29), OC (NMBF = −4.92), and PM 2.5 (NMBF = −1.34), suggesting that seasonality in emissions has little impact on reducing model bias. The low bias in our model, particularly for BC and OC, is consistent with previous modelling studies using bottom-up emission inventories in South Asia (Ganguly et al, 2009;Nair et al, 2012;Moorthy et al, 2013;Pan et al, 2015) and East Asia (Park et al, 2005;Koch et al, 2009;Fu et al, 2012). The contribution of residential emissions is illustrated by the model simulation where these emissions are switched off, with substantially greater underestimation of BC (NMBF = −5.12), OC (NMBF = −11.46), and PM 2.5 (NMBF = −1.60) concentrations (Fig.…”
Section: Model Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The simulation with monthly varying emissions compares slightly better with observations compared to the baseline simulation but still underestimates BC (NMBF = −2.29), OC (NMBF = −4.92), and PM 2.5 (NMBF = −1.34), suggesting that seasonality in emissions has little impact on reducing model bias. The low bias in our model, particularly for BC and OC, is consistent with previous modelling studies using bottom-up emission inventories in South Asia (Ganguly et al, 2009;Nair et al, 2012;Moorthy et al, 2013;Pan et al, 2015) and East Asia (Park et al, 2005;Koch et al, 2009;Fu et al, 2012). The contribution of residential emissions is illustrated by the model simulation where these emissions are switched off, with substantially greater underestimation of BC (NMBF = −5.12), OC (NMBF = −11.46), and PM 2.5 (NMBF = −1.60) concentrations (Fig.…”
Section: Model Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The baseline simulation underestimated observed BC, OC, and PM 2.5 concentrations, with the largest underestimation over East Asia and South Asia, consistent with other modelling studies (Fu et al, 2012;Moorthy et al, 2013;Pan et al, 2015). Applying monthly varying emissions (MACCity emission data set), in place of annual mean emissions (ACCMIP emission), has little improvement on overall model bias but does improve the ability of the model to simulate the observed seasonal variability of aerosol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations