2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2016.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of an active magnetic regenerator for cooling applications – part II: Mathematical modeling and thermal losses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 displays the evolution of the generated entropy as a function of the nanoparticle concentration. The different contributions to Equation (12) have been integrated both along the regenerator and over a cycle after the system reached a steady-state regime. For φ = 0%, convection S conv contributes to 87.71% of the total generated entropy S gen .…”
Section: Influence Of the Nanoparticle Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 3 displays the evolution of the generated entropy as a function of the nanoparticle concentration. The different contributions to Equation (12) have been integrated both along the regenerator and over a cycle after the system reached a steady-state regime. For φ = 0%, convection S conv contributes to 87.71% of the total generated entropy S gen .…”
Section: Influence Of the Nanoparticle Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical 1D or 2D models appeared also as valuable tools to design new active magnetic regenerative refrigeration (AMRR) systems [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Tagliafico et al [8] considered a reciprocating AMR with powder of gadolinium and investigated the influences of both the utilization factor UF (within the range [0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…gadolinium (Gd), whose physical properties, namely adiabatic temperature change, specific heat capacity and magnetization were obtained from interpolating functions generated from experimental data. The reader is referred to Trevizoli (2015) and Trevizoli et al (2016b) for a detailed presentation of the Gd physical property database. The mathematical model is described next, taking into account the following simplifying assumptions: one-dimensional, incompressible fluid flow, low-porosity porous medium (ε < 0.6) and absence of body forces (Trevizoli et al 2014b, Trevizoli andBarbosa 2015).…”
Section: -Mathematical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mathematical model is described next, taking into account the following simplifying assumptions: one-dimensional, incompressible fluid flow, low-porosity porous medium (ε < 0.6) and absence of body forces (Trevizoli et al 2014b, Trevizoli andBarbosa 2015). The mathematical model and the closure relationships for packed beds of spheres used in the present analysis were compared with experimental data for passive and active magnetic regenerators (Trevizoli et al 2016a, 2016b, Trevizoli and Barbosa 2016.…”
Section: -Mathematical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%