2018
DOI: 10.17059/2018-1-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Criteria of Spatial Development Projects Based on Interregional Integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, maintaining a conservative approach to spatial development does not meet the interests of a significant part of the citizens of Russia, as it leads to further differentiation of territories and population groups in terms of income and quality of life. The market organization of space is based on the concept of polarized spatial development (controlled compression), while state retention of space is based on the concept of endogenous economic growth, which, according to Kurushina and Petrov (2018), does not exclude the sharing of these approaches in solving spatial development problems. Interestingly, these authors suggest the predominant use of a uniformly hierarchical model characteristic of a conservative approach for the development of rural territories, thereby indirectly recognizing the uncompetitiveness of rural settlements relative to urban ones and their inability to mobilize internal development resources, including due to the lack of the above mentioned.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, maintaining a conservative approach to spatial development does not meet the interests of a significant part of the citizens of Russia, as it leads to further differentiation of territories and population groups in terms of income and quality of life. The market organization of space is based on the concept of polarized spatial development (controlled compression), while state retention of space is based on the concept of endogenous economic growth, which, according to Kurushina and Petrov (2018), does not exclude the sharing of these approaches in solving spatial development problems. Interestingly, these authors suggest the predominant use of a uniformly hierarchical model characteristic of a conservative approach for the development of rural territories, thereby indirectly recognizing the uncompetitiveness of rural settlements relative to urban ones and their inability to mobilize internal development resources, including due to the lack of the above mentioned.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having pre-existing ties, regions turned into fragmented, deeply different parts of a national entity. Governmental reforms aimed at strengthening the interaction between regions and reducing economic disparities showed moderate results [25,26]. In 2018, the gap between the most and least developed regions in terms of shipped own production, performed works and services was 721 times, investment in fixed assets -229 times.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and The Case Of Russiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gizatullin, F. Garipov and Z. Garipova (2018). The application of the project approach to spatial development of the territories is substantiated by Kurushina and Petrov (2018). In particular, the authors propose to take into account the synergistic effects of interregional interaction in the process of project evaluation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%