2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Comparison of Moving and Fluidized bed Sorption Systems for an Energy-efficient Solid Sorbent-Based Carbon Capture Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Short residence times would allow in practice the use of a commercial circulating fluidized bed (CFB) reactor for the carbonator operated at high gas velocities (of a few meters per second). CFB reactors provide optimum heat and mass transfer and are commonly employed in industrial applications to enhance gas–solid reactions. Carbonator models based on CFBs are being widely studied in recent years for the application of the CaL process to capture CO 2 as depending on the multicycle CaO conversion and carbonation kinetics. In this regard, an interesting subject for further work would be to adapt these models to the particular behavior of the sorbents for CaL-CSP conditions to obtain relevant parameters for optimum performance such as the solids residence time.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short residence times would allow in practice the use of a commercial circulating fluidized bed (CFB) reactor for the carbonator operated at high gas velocities (of a few meters per second). CFB reactors provide optimum heat and mass transfer and are commonly employed in industrial applications to enhance gas–solid reactions. Carbonator models based on CFBs are being widely studied in recent years for the application of the CaL process to capture CO 2 as depending on the multicycle CaO conversion and carbonation kinetics. In this regard, an interesting subject for further work would be to adapt these models to the particular behavior of the sorbents for CaL-CSP conditions to obtain relevant parameters for optimum performance such as the solids residence time.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the application of another type of solid–gas contactor, such as fluidized bed or moving bed may help overcome such limitations. The choice of any of the previous alternatives can be confusing since the type of reactor does not seem to depend directly on the sorption mechanism or the type of adsorbent, as suggested by Kim et al Their investigation also concluded that both fluidized and moving beds could be a less expensive option as compared to amine absorption and that the moving bed could be even more cost-effective if there is heat integration during the regeneration of the adsorbent. Consequently, the moving bed temperature swing adsorption process (MBTSA) is being regarded as a potential technology to reduce the cost of energy demand in large-scale CO 2 capture by means of intelligent heat integration, which is not easy to achieve with circulating fluidized bed or bubbling processes .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also researchers from Kawasaki in Japan published results from a CO2 capture test for moving-bed system, however, lacking information about the process details and adsorbent used [7]. Kim and coworkers showed by modelling how the energy demand of the process can be significantly reduced by heat exchange between the hot adsorbent leaving the desorber with the cold adsorbent entering the desorber [8,9]. We have recently shown that reduced energy penalty compared to state-of-art amine based capture can be achieved when using the MBTSA process in a post-combustion NGCC context [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%