2017 Ninth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icufn.2017.7993785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison of blind and non-blind channel equalizers using artificial neural networks

Abstract: Abstract-In digital communication systems, multipath propagation induces Inter Symbol Interference (ISI).To reduce the effect of ISI different channel equalization algorithms are used. Complex equalization algorithms allow for achieving the best performance but they do not meet the requirements for implementation of real-time detection at low complexity, thus limiting their application. In this paper, we present different blind and non-blind equalization structures based on Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our first set of experiments, we compared our model to the baseline algorithms at various noise levels, using the following non-minimum phase channels taken from [11], [24], [26], We generated 2000 QPSK random symbols as the training set. Then we applied convolution with the channel impulse response, and added white Gaussian noise at a signal to noise ratio (SNR) in the range 0dB -10dB.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our first set of experiments, we compared our model to the baseline algorithms at various noise levels, using the following non-minimum phase channels taken from [11], [24], [26], We generated 2000 QPSK random symbols as the training set. Then we applied convolution with the channel impulse response, and added white Gaussian noise at a signal to noise ratio (SNR) in the range 0dB -10dB.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our first set of experiments, we compared our model to the baseline algorithms at various noise levels, using the following non-minimum phase channels taken from [11], [24], [26], present SER results for h 1 , h 2 and h 3 , respectively. As can be seen, the new VAEBCE significantly outperforms the baseline blind equalizers, and is quite close to the performance of the non-blind adaptive MMSE.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years, FLANN is very famous [52]. It is a single-layer NN that can form complex decision boundaries.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of ANN in developing the algorithm has the benefit of accuracy. Also, ANN is equipped with the uniqueness of concurrent processing, can learn and recall data relationships, and mapping of non-linear instances [34,35]. It is also used in several mathematical calculations [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%