2017
DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n2p919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and serum chemistry profile of lambs fed on rations with increasing levels of urea

Abstract: Feed intake and efficiency, animal performance, and protein and energy metabolism were studied in lambs that were fed on increasing levels of urea (0.0, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5% of dry matter [DM]). A completely randomized design was used, with four treatments (urea levels) and six replicates. The lambs were fed ad libitum for 56 days until they reached an average body weight of 35 kg. The rations were composed of 34% Tifton 85 hay (Cynodon spp.) and 66% concentrate. Crude protein (CP) constituted 17% of the diet on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported by Vivian et al (2017) and Rozanski et al (2017), DMI, ADG, SW, CCW and CCY (Table 2) were not affected by the inclusion of urea in the ration, which demonstrated that levels of urea ranging from 0.0 to 1.5% DM provide the same productive response in crossbred Dorper lambs finished in a feedlot. Regarding the CR, the minimum and maximum costs were verified in the rations with 1.0% DM of urea and without urea, respectively (0.23 and 0.30US$/kg DM, respectively; Table 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As reported by Vivian et al (2017) and Rozanski et al (2017), DMI, ADG, SW, CCW and CCY (Table 2) were not affected by the inclusion of urea in the ration, which demonstrated that levels of urea ranging from 0.0 to 1.5% DM provide the same productive response in crossbred Dorper lambs finished in a feedlot. Regarding the CR, the minimum and maximum costs were verified in the rations with 1.0% DM of urea and without urea, respectively (0.23 and 0.30US$/kg DM, respectively; Table 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In the present study, the best economic result was also followed by the best biological responses (lower DMI and higher ADG and CCY; Table 2), providing even more support for the ration with 1.5% DM of urea. Also, Vivian et al (2017) found that CP intake was not affected by the addition of urea to the rations tested in the present study, which indicates another advantage for the ration with 1.5% DM of urea. Khattab et al (2013) reported that the DM digestibility increased, the nitrogen (N) excretion in feces is reduced and the N excretion in urine is not affected when the urea content increases from 0.0 to 1.5% DM of ration.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional results of this study obtained by Vivian et al (2017) indicated there was no significant effect (P> 0.05) of urea levels on DM intake (DMI). The average DMI during the trial was 1.174 kg animal -1 d -1 , and met the requirements for fast and moderate growth according to the NRC (1985) (DMI = 1.0 to 1.3 kg DM animal -1 d -1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The high NDF on these diets is associated with the greater inclusion of soybean hulls in their compositions with inclusion of 25 and 49% DM, respectively. In assessing the nutrient intake by lambs of this study, Vivian et al (2017) observed a quadratic effect of urea levels on NDF intake, which reached a maximum value (0.665 kg DM d -1 ) in the ration with 1.0% DM of urea. However, the regression equation indicates that the maximum NDF intake (0.604 kg DM d -1 ) may be achieved with the inclusion of 0.85% DM of urea in the ration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%