2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.104827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of infrared film drying of grape pomace using energy and exergy methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, samples can be heated rapidly using higher levels of radiation and higher temperatures, resulting in faster evaporation and higher energy efficiency (Dolgun et al, 2020). Motevali et al (2018) indicated that a hybrid IR-CV dryer increased the drying efficiency, as heat transfer simultaneously occurs through radiation and convection.…”
Section: Energy Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, samples can be heated rapidly using higher levels of radiation and higher temperatures, resulting in faster evaporation and higher energy efficiency (Dolgun et al, 2020). Motevali et al (2018) indicated that a hybrid IR-CV dryer increased the drying efficiency, as heat transfer simultaneously occurs through radiation and convection.…”
Section: Energy Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moisture transfer rate to moisture diffusivity rate was also estimated by means of mass transfer Biot number (Bi) as [24] m hL Bi D = (9)…”
Section: Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, it has been determined that the exergy efficiencies of LED and DLST + LED modes were lower than the DLST mode for all light intensities, similar to the findings for the energy efficiencies. In the literature, it has been reported that energy and exergy efficiencies in food drying processes can vary between 9% and 86% and between 2% and 60%, respectively (Dolgun, Karaca, & Aktas ¸, 2020;Golpour, Kaveh, Chayjan, & Guiné, 2020;Icier, Ozmen, Cevik, & Cokgezme, 2021;Kavak Akpinar, 2019;Murugavelh, Anand, Midhun Prasad, Nagarajan, & Azariah Pravin Kumar, 2019;Tagnamas et al, 2021;Tezcan, Sabancı, Cevik, Cokgezme, & Icier, 2021). The differences are related to the system conditions, process parameters, different expressions for efficiency, drying method and system designs, and so on.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of Process Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Midilli & Kucuk, 2003;Akpinar, 2004;Corzo, Bracho, Vásquez, & Pereira, 2008;(Icier et al, 2021). In a recent study (Dolgun et al, 2020), the energy and exergy efficiencies for the application of drying grape pomace samples in a drying system with infrared radiation and fan were reported in the range of 32.85%-35.91%, and 8.68%-21.82%, respectively. They reported that the exergy efficiency of drying with natural convection during infrared drying was 10% higher than drying with forced convection.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of Process Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%