1995
DOI: 10.1049/ip-com:19951551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of burst admission-control protocols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are no longer considering the slotted ring and OBS-JET architectures since, under uniform traffic conditions, their performance is suboptimal, as shown in the previous section. This choice is also supported by results reported in [49], where end-to-end versus hop-by-hop reservation protocols were analyzed (in the context of ATM networks). The relative performance did not change when switching from uniform to nonuniform traffic.…”
Section: Impact Of Nonuniform Trafficsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…We are no longer considering the slotted ring and OBS-JET architectures since, under uniform traffic conditions, their performance is suboptimal, as shown in the previous section. This choice is also supported by results reported in [49], where end-to-end versus hop-by-hop reservation protocols were analyzed (in the context of ATM networks). The relative performance did not change when switching from uniform to nonuniform traffic.…”
Section: Impact Of Nonuniform Trafficsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…One variation of OBS is based on the Telland-Go protocol for Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) networks [9], in which end users act as sources for bursts of data [10]. In the more common implementation of OBS, however, packets are assembled at access nodes, according to destination and quality of service, to form collections of packets known as bursts.…”
Section: Obsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…JET is the most prevailing distributed protocol for OBS networks today that does not require any kind of optical delays. [5] Proposed a new approach that assigns different extra offset times to different service classes so as to provide differentiated services in terms of burst loss probability for classes of different priorities, this reduce the loss rate of high priority traffic at the expense of an increase in the loos rate of lower priority traffic. In the end-to-end delay, is present the extra offset time.…”
Section: Just-enough-time (Jet)mentioning
confidence: 99%