2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of a Kalina cycle for a central receiver solar thermal power plant with direct steam generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The cold medium is the ammonia-water mixture with an ammonia mass fraction, inlet temperature, and pressure of 0.7, 25 • C and 40 bar, respectively. The pinch point temperature difference is 15 K, and the approach temperature difference (hot fluid inlet, cold fluid outlet) is 20 K. The ammonia mass fraction and pressure are varied from 0.5 to 0.9 and from 40 to 100 bar, respectively, which are typical inlet conditions of the boiler in Kalina cycles [12,31,32]. …”
Section: Hrb Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cold medium is the ammonia-water mixture with an ammonia mass fraction, inlet temperature, and pressure of 0.7, 25 • C and 40 bar, respectively. The pinch point temperature difference is 15 K, and the approach temperature difference (hot fluid inlet, cold fluid outlet) is 20 K. The ammonia mass fraction and pressure are varied from 0.5 to 0.9 and from 40 to 100 bar, respectively, which are typical inlet conditions of the boiler in Kalina cycles [12,31,32]. …”
Section: Hrb Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the two cases represent boilers with either poor or good heat transfer characteristics on the secondary side. The boiler is usually the largest component in the Kalina cycle, taking up about half of the total surface area [9] and destroying the most exergy [12]. In contrast to the work by Thorin [9], several transport property estimation methods will be analyzed by simulating each possible combination individually, and a suitable two-phase heat transfer correlation will be used instead of the fixed constant coefficient assumption by Thorin [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bombarda et al [11] compared the performance of a Kalina cycle, with the separator located at an intermediate pressure level, and an ORC for utilization of diesel engine waste heat at 346 • C. They found that the two cycles produced similar power outputs, while the pressure in the Kalina cycle was significantly higher than in the ORC. Modi and Haglind [12,13] optimized four Kalina cycles for utilization of concentrated solar energy (expander inlet temperature over 450 • C). They found that the cycle layout with the most recuperators obtained the highest cycle efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its , for waste heat recovery [4][5][6][7], for exhaust heat recovery in a gas turbine modular helium reactor [8], in combined heat and power plants [9,10], coupled with a coal-fired steam power plant for exhaust heat recovery [11], as a part of Brayton-Rankine-Kalina triple cycle [12], and in solar power plants [13,14]. For high temperature applications, the Kalina cycles have been investigated to be used as gas turbine bottoming cycles [15][16][17][18], for industrial 15 waste heat recovery, biomass based cogeneration and gas engine waste heat recovery [19], for direct-fired cogeneration applications [20], and in concentrating solar power (CSP) plants [21,22]. There have been discussions regarding the feasibility of using ammonia-water mixtures at high temperatures due to the nitridation effect resulting in the corrosion of the equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 shows the optimal cycle efficiency values for the different turbine inlet ammonia mass fractions. The trend of the variation in the cycle efficiency with the turbine inlet ammonia mass fraction was explained in detail for the KC12 layout by Modi and Haglind [21]. In short, the rate of exergy destruction in the two condensers CD1 and CD2, the recuperator RE1 and the turbine TUR shows a decreasing trend; whereas the rate of exergy destruction 265 in the recuperator RE2 first increases and then decreases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%