2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2314-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases

Abstract: Large colorectal liver metastases can be effectively treated by stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA). Using SRFA the overall survival is not affected by tumour size. SRFA achieves similar overall and disease-free survival rates as surgical resection. SRFA challenges surgical resection as the first-line treatment for colorectal liver metastases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
78
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
78
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Ablation is an effective option for patients who are not candidates for hepatic resection due to inadequate FLR or patient co-morbidities [51]. Other criteria for the use of ablation include fewer than 3 CRLM and hepatic tumor size less than 3 cm [52,53]. Although the use of ablative techniques is popular and safer in some patients when compared with surgical resection, ablation results in higher local recurrence rates [8,[52][53][54].…”
Section: Surgical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ablation is an effective option for patients who are not candidates for hepatic resection due to inadequate FLR or patient co-morbidities [51]. Other criteria for the use of ablation include fewer than 3 CRLM and hepatic tumor size less than 3 cm [52,53]. Although the use of ablative techniques is popular and safer in some patients when compared with surgical resection, ablation results in higher local recurrence rates [8,[52][53][54].…”
Section: Surgical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other criteria for the use of ablation include fewer than 3 CRLM and hepatic tumor size less than 3 cm [52,53]. Although the use of ablative techniques is popular and safer in some patients when compared with surgical resection, ablation results in higher local recurrence rates [8,[52][53][54]. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the most commonly-used ablation technique used currently and can be used to ablate residual unresectable disease as well as to treat small hepatic recurrences [8,52,53,55].…”
Section: Surgical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experience with RFA determines complete ablation and post-operative morbidities, as demonstrated by Poon et al [20]. On the other hand, Bale and colleagues demonstrated that experience did not influence treatment outcome of stereotactic radiofrequency ablation as the technology allows accurate multiple needle placements, however, with compromised complication rates of up to 17% [21,22].…”
Section: Delivery Of Rfamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of morbidity rates following RFA for unresectable CLMs have been reported, ranging from 1.7% to 27% [13,15,[22][23][24]26,30,37,47]. Morbidity following RFA is inversely proportional to the experience of the proceduralist [4].…”
Section: Rfa-related Morbidity and Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 99%