2014
DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2013.876391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived landscape values and public participation in a road-planning process – a case study in Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Henningsson et al, 2015;Weber, 2013). This paper could thus provide insights for increasing residential satisfaction near highways or other infrastructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Henningsson et al, 2015;Weber, 2013). This paper could thus provide insights for increasing residential satisfaction near highways or other infrastructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sweden has a long tradition of stakeholder engagement in state-funded projects in the form of participatory meetings and written feedback. However, other participatory techniques are less established (Henningsson et al, 2014). Furthermore, individual and informal agencies, as well as small associations (in Swedish, förening), do not have the same visibility and influence in the planning process as other institutional stakeholders do.…”
Section: The Importance Of Residents/users' Participation In Renewable Energy Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent literature on landscape governance, however, recognizes the limited capacity of the ES approach to capture a range of non-material, non-quantifiable values that have been shown to play an important role in motivating public support for ecosystem protection (Schaich et al 2010;Plieninger et al 2014;Kull et al 2015). Scholars in several disciplines thus call for more deliberative, participatory, and place-based approaches to account for the full range of landscape values in decision making (Dakin 2003;Potschin and Haines-Young 2013;de Groot et al 2014;Plieninger et al 2014;Henningsson et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%