2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6257(00)00141-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Penetrating Keratoplasty and Glaucoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
119
2
12

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
1
119
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of traumatic IOP elevation and glaucoma after PKP is known to be elevated, ranging between 11 and 48%, [20][21][22][23][24] and is perhaps particularly elevated in eyes after penetrating eye injury. 25 Mechanisms for IOP elevation after PKP include postoperative edema and inflammation compromising the trabecular meshwork, angle scarring, peripheral anterior synechiae, retained viscoelastics, and steroid response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of traumatic IOP elevation and glaucoma after PKP is known to be elevated, ranging between 11 and 48%, [20][21][22][23][24] and is perhaps particularly elevated in eyes after penetrating eye injury. 25 Mechanisms for IOP elevation after PKP include postoperative edema and inflammation compromising the trabecular meshwork, angle scarring, peripheral anterior synechiae, retained viscoelastics, and steroid response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The causes of glaucoma include progression of the synechial angle closure and response to topical steroids. These mechanisms should also work in eyes after PK for bullous keratopathy having previously trabeculectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible causes of immediate raised IOP after PKP are: rejection, vitreous in the anterior chamber, hyphaema, inflammation, response to steroids, and ghost cell glaucoma. 7 Viscoelastic retention after intraocular procedures is not common, as every effort is usually made to completely remove it at the end of the procedure. In our case, despite an apparent complete removal of Healon GV from the anterior chamber, Figure 1 Release of viscoelastic from the Molteno plate.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%