2021
DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2021.1953986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pembrolizumab in the treatment of refractory primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma: safety and efficacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ITs have brought about a new era in solid cancer therapy, attaining unprecedented longlasting responses even in metastatic diseases [1]. In the context of hematologic malignancies, similar results have been observed in lymphomas [2][3][4]. In the context of AML, although analogue studies have been conducted, most of them have failed to advance to the third phase, and no drug has yet been approved for AML.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ITs have brought about a new era in solid cancer therapy, attaining unprecedented longlasting responses even in metastatic diseases [1]. In the context of hematologic malignancies, similar results have been observed in lymphomas [2][3][4]. In the context of AML, although analogue studies have been conducted, most of them have failed to advance to the third phase, and no drug has yet been approved for AML.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Anti-cancer immune-based therapeutics (ITs) rely on different approaches that aim to support host immune effectors in clearing neoplastic clones. Although ITs have improved the prognosis of several advanced-stage solid tumors (metastatic melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, head and neck cancers, and non-small lung cancer) [1], the benefits of ITs have been limited in relation to hematological malignancies, and are mostly restricted to classical Hodgkin lymphoma and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma [2][3][4]. In the context of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), despite the introduction of new drugs and the presence of three updated classifications published in 2022 [5,6], which allow for more effective prognostic stratification, no ITs drugs are currently approved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ITs have opened a new era in solid cancer therapy, attaining unprecedented long-lasting responses even in metastatic diseases [1]. In hematologic malignancies, similar results have been observed in lymphomas [2][3][4]. In AML, although analogue studies have been conducted, most of them have failed to advance to phase 3 studies and currently no drug is approved for AML, yet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Anti-cancer immune-based therapeutics (ITs) rely on different approaches that have the goal to support host immune effectors to clear neoplastic clones. Although ITs have improved the prognosis of several advanced-stage solid tumors (metastatic melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, head and neck cancers, and non-small lung cancer) [1], benefits of ITs have been more limited in hematological malignancies, mostly restricted to classical Hodgkin lymphoma and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma [2][3][4]. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML) several considerations need to be taken into account to correctly evaluate ITs: AML patients are severely immuno-compromised and the introduction or the addition of novel therapies may potentially alter the landscape of infectious complications with clinical practice guidelines being frequently updated by the European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL) [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] Despite continuous efforts to use it to treat lymphomas, immunotherapy has only been effective for classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) [8][9][10][11] and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMLBL). 12,13 Even after treating diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)-the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma-with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) therapy, the 5-year survival rate is approximately 70%. 14 Therefore, we need to improve the prognosis of DLBCL patients through immunotherapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%