Pelvic organ motion and dosimetric implications during horizontal patient rotation for prostate radiation therapy

Abstract

Purpose Gantry‐free radiation therapy systems utilizing patient rotation would be simpler and more cost effective than the conventional gantry‐based systems. Such a system could enable the expansion of radiation therapy to meet global demand and reduce capital costs. Recent advances in adaptive radiation therapy could potentially be applied to correct for gravitational deformation during horizontal patient rotation. This study aims to quantify the pelvic organ motion and the dosimetric implications of horizontal rotation for prostate intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatments. Methods Eight human participants who previously received prostate radiation therapy were imaged in a clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner using a bespoke patient rotation system (PRS). The patients were imaged every 45 degrees during a full roll rotation (0–360 degrees). Whole pelvic bone, prostate, rectum, and bladder motion were compared to the supine position using dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean absolute surface distance (MASD). Prostate centroid motion was compared in the left–right (LR), superior–inferior (SI), and anterior–posterior (AP) direction prior to and following pelvic bone‐guided rigid registration. Seven‐field prostate IMRT treatment plans were generated for each patient rotation angles under three adaption scenarios: No plan adaption, rigid planning target volume (PTV)‐guided alignment to the prostate, and plan re‐optimization. Prostate, rectum, and bladder doses were compared for each adaption scenario. Results Pelvic bone motion within the PRS of up to 53 mm relative to the supine position was observed for some participants. Internal organ motion was greatest at the 180‐degree PRS couch angle (prone), with prostate centroid motion range < 2 mm LR, 0 mm to 14 mm SI, and −11 mm to 4 mm AP. Rotation with no adaption of the treatment plan resulted in an underdose to the PTV –– in some instances up to 75% (D95%: 78 ± 0.3 Gy at supine to 20 ± 15.0 Gy at the 225‐degree PRS couch angle). Bladder dose was reduced during the rotation by up to 98% (V60 Gy: 15.0 ± 9.4% supine to 0.3 ± 0.5% at the 225‐degree PRS couch angle). In some instances, the rectum dose increased during rotation (V60Gy: 20.0 ± 4.5% supine to 25.0 ± 15.0% at the 135‐degree PRS couch angle). Rigid PTV‐guided alignment resulted in PTV coverage which, though statistically lower (P < 0.05 for all D95% values), was within 1 Gy of the supine plans. Plan re‐optimization resulted in a statistically equivalent PTV coverage compared to the supine plans (P > 0.05 for all D95% metrics and all within ±0.4 Gy). For both rigid PTV‐guided alignment and plan re‐optimization, rectum dose volume metrics were reduced compared to the supine position between the 90‐ and 225‐degree PRS couch angles (P < 0.05). Bladder dose volume metrics were not impacted by rotation. Conclusion Pelvic bone and internal organ motion are present during patient rotation. Rigid PTV‐guided alignment to the prostate will be a requirement if prostate IMRT is to be safel...

3D-US and CBCT Dual-guided Radiotherapy for Postoperative Uterine Malignancy: A Primary Workflow Set-up

“…After maintaining the consistency of bladder volume, the centroid of the bladder was also compared in this study with the purpose to represent the position changes of the bladder. So far, the comparison of bladder centroids has been proposed in studies for uterine malignancy, 33 prostate cancer, 34 and bladder cancer 35 radiotherapy. Based on the results monitored by the Clarity system, it was found that the bladder displacement is clearly insignificant in most patients (see Table 3), providing the first evidence that the dual-guidance showed the therapeutic potential for postoperative uterine malignancy patients.…”

Nano X Image Guidance in radiation therapy: feasibility study protocol for cone beam computed tomography imaging with gravity-induced motion

“…We have previously shown in a proof-of that improving the accuracy of CBCT images will improve the accuracy of radiation therapy treatment. The level of treatment plan adaptation required to compensate for observed patient and target motion will be evaluated and the dosimetric impacts of no adaptation versus iso-centre shift and full plan re-optimisation will be compared in a similar fashion to Buckley et al [ 17 ].…”

Adaptive radiotherapy of locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer with intra‑fractional motion using the MRIdian system: A case report

“…Combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with radiotherapy is an optional treatment for patients with locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer (2), and it usually accompanies complete mesocolic excision (3,4). Considerable variation in the small intestine and bladder following pelvic and lower abdomen irradiation can lead to normal organ toxicity (5)(6)(7). Consequently, the goal of treatment is to improve the prognosis of patients, reduce toxicity and enable patients to complete treatment without interruption.…”