2017 IEEE 25th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icnp.2017.8117549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peering vs. transit: Performance comparison of peering and transit interconnections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that while their median RTT increased, the new announcements provided a shorter AS path via a different provider. Previous work has found that peering links outperform their transit counterparts in many cases [5]. Our findings here do not necessarily contradict this, but serve as an indicator that managing the inbound paths to a network is a different issue than overall or egress performance.…”
Section: Performance Impactssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that while their median RTT increased, the new announcements provided a shorter AS path via a different provider. Previous work has found that peering links outperform their transit counterparts in many cases [5]. Our findings here do not necessarily contradict this, but serve as an indicator that managing the inbound paths to a network is a different issue than overall or egress performance.…”
Section: Performance Impactssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…There has been a significant body of work exploring the economic and performance trade-offs of Internet connectivity [5,37]. Others have examined the increasing flatness of the Internet topology [13,20,22,26,35].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IXPs were originally created to locally interconnect ASes at layer-2 (L2), and keep local traffic local [39]. Under this model, networks peer at IXPs to directly connect with each other and avoid connections through third parties, and thus reduce costs, improve performance (e.g., lower latency), and better control the exchanged traffic [26,67]. However, the ever-increasing traffic flowing at the edge of the Internet, creates pressure for denser and more diverse peering that challenges the traditional IXP model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IXPs enable Autonomous Systems (ASes) to reach hundreds of other networks [2] directly. By increasing connectivity, IXPs contribute to improving the quality of Internet traffic delivery with lower latency and higher throughput [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%