2019
DOI: 10.1109/lnet.2019.2922208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peering Among Content-Dominated Vertical ISPs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they do not consider the economic aspects of interconnection such as cost sharing, we focus on determining the fair payment between an ISP and an interconnecting transit provider or content provider for peering. Dey and Yuksel [20] compare the performance of different peering scenarios, including direct peering, public peering, and paid peering. However, they focus on the peering strategies of vertically integrated ISPs that provide both content and access services, while we focus on determining the fair payment between ISPs and content providers or transit providers for peering arrangements.…”
Section: Research Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they do not consider the economic aspects of interconnection such as cost sharing, we focus on determining the fair payment between an ISP and an interconnecting transit provider or content provider for peering. Dey and Yuksel [20] compare the performance of different peering scenarios, including direct peering, public peering, and paid peering. However, they focus on the peering strategies of vertically integrated ISPs that provide both content and access services, while we focus on determining the fair payment between ISPs and content providers or transit providers for peering arrangements.…”
Section: Research Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dey et al portray an approximate timeline of peering relationship evolution [15]. ISPs can choose either bi-lateral private peering using dedicated physical links or multi-lateral public peering using a Route-Server.…”
Section: Motivation and Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%