Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance
Select...
1
1
0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The process of peer review, mainly in publishing but also in other aspects of academic life is regularly discussed (Fyfe , Smith ). The process recently came under the scrutiny of the British government (House of Commons Science and Technology Committee ) and other bodies (Watson ) after some accusations about biased publishing in the field of climate science. The scrutiny was in‐depth and prolonged, but the conclusion was that the peer review system in it various manifestations were far from perfect, but that it was the best we had and should continue.…”
Section: Issues With Peer Reviewmentioning
Create an account to read the remaining citation statements from this report. You will also get access to:
  • Search over 1b+ citation statments to see what is being said about any topic in the research literature
  • Advanced Search to find publications that support or contrast your research
  • Citation reports and visualizations to easily see what publications are saying about each other
  • Browser extension to see Smart Citations wherever you read research
  • Dashboards to evaluate and keep track of groups of publications
  • Alerts to stay on top of citations as they happen
  • Automated reference checks to make sure you are citing reliable research in your manuscripts
  • 14 day free preview of our premium features.

Trusted by researchers and organizations around the world

Over 100,000 students researchers, and industry experts at use scite

See what students are saying

rupbmjkragerfmgwileyiopcupepmcmbcthiemesagefrontiersapsiucrarxivemeralduhksmucshluniversity-of-gavle
“…The process of peer review, mainly in publishing but also in other aspects of academic life is regularly discussed (Fyfe , Smith ). The process recently came under the scrutiny of the British government (House of Commons Science and Technology Committee ) and other bodies (Watson ) after some accusations about biased publishing in the field of climate science. The scrutiny was in‐depth and prolonged, but the conclusion was that the peer review system in it various manifestations were far from perfect, but that it was the best we had and should continue.…”
Section: Issues With Peer Reviewmentioning
“…Their names, affiliations and contributions to their specialized field, already published research can be viewed for the transparency of the system. (1) For still others, the review reports of the reviewers are also published alongside the research articles. In some situations, only invited experts are allowed to give their review reports.…”
Section: Editorialmentioning