2022
DOI: 10.56499/jppres22.1387.10.4.616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pectinas modificadas con actividad contra el cáncer de colon: Una revisión sistemática de 2010-2021

Abstract: Context: Colon cancer is a serious disease that can be hereditary or arise from exposure to carcinogens in unhealthy food. Current chemotherapy treatment has serious cardiovascular adverse effects, is not always effective, and there may be resistance to treatment. Recently, studies have found an optimal anticancer activity of modified pectins on colon cancer. Aims: To systematically review the scientific literature, with PRISMA guidelines, of the articles found in the last 11 years, on the potential anticance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 61 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessment of the quality of the selected articles was done independently by each author using the AXIS tool, which is a critical appraisal tool that evaluates the quality and risk of bias of a study (Downes et al, 2016). It was developed via the Delphi panel that consisted of 20 components (Mat Sharil et al, 2022; Pérez‐Loyola et al, 2022). Selected articles that meet the AXIS criteria with a score greater than 12.5 were selected, as declared in inclusion criteria.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of the quality of the selected articles was done independently by each author using the AXIS tool, which is a critical appraisal tool that evaluates the quality and risk of bias of a study (Downes et al, 2016). It was developed via the Delphi panel that consisted of 20 components (Mat Sharil et al, 2022; Pérez‐Loyola et al, 2022). Selected articles that meet the AXIS criteria with a score greater than 12.5 were selected, as declared in inclusion criteria.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%