2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0389-5_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PCPS: A Web Server to Predict Proteasomal Cleavage Sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 ). Accordingly, in silico analysis of the INS-DRiP sequence on the Proteasome Cleavage Prediction Server (PCPS) [ 28 ] shows that the INS-DRiP 1–9 (MLYQHLLPL) 9-mer has a higher propensity to be processed by the immunoproteasome complex than by the constitutive proteasome. In addition, the localisation of trypsin digestion sites outside the 9-mer epitope region suggests that the β2i subunit may be involved in the processing of the INS-DRiP polypeptide but should not destroy the MLYQHLLPL epitope, meaning that its integrity is maintained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 ). Accordingly, in silico analysis of the INS-DRiP sequence on the Proteasome Cleavage Prediction Server (PCPS) [ 28 ] shows that the INS-DRiP 1–9 (MLYQHLLPL) 9-mer has a higher propensity to be processed by the immunoproteasome complex than by the constitutive proteasome. In addition, the localisation of trypsin digestion sites outside the 9-mer epitope region suggests that the β2i subunit may be involved in the processing of the INS-DRiP polypeptide but should not destroy the MLYQHLLPL epitope, meaning that its integrity is maintained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All epitopes for MHC I were found to have 100% proteasomal processing (Table 1). This is essential since the proteasome is responsible for the proteolytic degradation and MHC I presentation [33]. Epitopes RVRYYHQL, LWRNAFLAGAVPVVL, and RYFRWRRSFAVHITS were discarded because their interaction sites did not coincide with the speci c MHC pocket [34].…”
Section: Fut4-derived T-cell Epitopes Have Mhci/ii a Nitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature search and browser query were performed to identify currently available tools for proteasomal cleavage prediction (search terms included "cleavage prediction", "proteasomal prediction", "cleavage prediction tool", and "proteasomal cleavage prediction"). Through this search, six tools were identified including: NetChop 3.1 10 , the Proteasomal Cleavage Prediction Server (PCPS) 64 , PCleavage 65 , MAPPP 66 , PAProC 67 , and the random forest-based model described in Li et al (2012). NetChop version 3.1 was downloaded (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetChop/) and installed as a command line tool on a Linux server running CentOS 7.7.1908.…”
Section: Comparison Of Cleavage Prediction Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight proteasomal cleavage tools are shown (columns) along with their corresponding features (rows). Specific tools are as follows: pepsickle (presented here), NetChop 3.1 10 , the Proteasomal Cleavage Prediction Server (PCPS) 64 , PCleavage 65 , MAPPP 66 , PAProC 67 , and the random forest-based model described in Li et al 68 Check marks (green) represent available features for each tool while X's (red) represent unavailable features. Warning signs (yellow) represent missing information, or features that are mentioned but not currently available.…”
Section: Figure 2 Comparison Matrix Of Available Proteasomal Cleavage Tools and Their Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%