2012
DOI: 10.5195/errs.2012.147
View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: In this paper I consider Ricœur’s negotiation of the boundary or relationship between philosophy and religion in light of the larger debate in contemporary French philosophy. I suggest that contrasting his way of dealing with the intersection of the two discourses to that of two other French thinkers (Jean-Luc Marion and Michel Henry) illuminates his stance more fully. I begin with a brief outline of Ricœur’s claims about the distinction or relation between the discourses, then reflect on those of Marion and H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And especially in his last works on recognition and forgiveness it becomes very clear that he borrows concepts from both fields as, e.g. the role assigned to the agape in the discourse on recognition clearly shows (Gschwandtner 2012 , 10).…”
Section: Two Current Paradigms In Phenomenology Of Religionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And especially in his last works on recognition and forgiveness it becomes very clear that he borrows concepts from both fields as, e.g. the role assigned to the agape in the discourse on recognition clearly shows (Gschwandtner 2012 , 10).…”
Section: Two Current Paradigms In Phenomenology Of Religionmentioning
confidence: 99%