2006
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpl024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of regeneration and ground vegetation associated with canopy gaps in a managed beechwood in southern England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
28
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
9
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The superiority of small gaps was further confirmed with respect to the growth characteristics of dominant individual beech trees and height growth. Results of this study are similar to results of Mountford et al (2006) and Gálhidy et al (2006) who found more prolific beech regeneration in small and medium gaps and are in accordance with conclusions of Bolte et al (2007), who stressed the importance of soil water resource management through adequate beech regeneration in small gap openings. On the contrary Madsen and Hahn (2008) didn't confirm gap partitioning of regeneration and stressed the importance beech advance regeneration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The superiority of small gaps was further confirmed with respect to the growth characteristics of dominant individual beech trees and height growth. Results of this study are similar to results of Mountford et al (2006) and Gálhidy et al (2006) who found more prolific beech regeneration in small and medium gaps and are in accordance with conclusions of Bolte et al (2007), who stressed the importance of soil water resource management through adequate beech regeneration in small gap openings. On the contrary Madsen and Hahn (2008) didn't confirm gap partitioning of regeneration and stressed the importance beech advance regeneration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…gap partitioning), therefore direct transfer of knowledge may be limited. In addition, few studies have investigated within-gap resource heterogeneity, which plays an important role in regeneration processes (Gálhidy et al 2006;Mountford et al 2006;Rozenbergar et al 2007). These studies also indicate that within-gap micro site patterns are variable among site and stand combinations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of recruits differs on the particular plots in relation to vegetation cover of the herb layer, topography (Štícha et al 2010;Vacek et al 2015b) and canopy cover of mature forest (Madsen & Hahn 2008;Sefidi et al 2011). Light availability strongly affects the survival, growth rate and form of recruits (Grassi et al 2004;Mountford et al 2006). Taking into account an increasing beech proportion and generally relatively high numbers of recruits it is to state that the stand transformation currently develops well and should result in more stable forest stands better adapted to climate change in future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overstory layer operates as a filter by intercepting the incoming light signal, and therefore, controls the structural complexity of the understory layer [3]. For example, if gap sizes become too small in beech forests, beech seedlings may wither, but if gap sizes are too large, beech seedlings may be ineffective at reaching the gap center, due to increased competition with, e.g., bramble, ash or maple [4]. In addition to size, the shape complexity of gaps determines biodiversity and woody regeneration, because it likely influences the competitive or facilitative relationships of plant species in the understory [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%