1996
DOI: 10.1097/00005053-199611000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of Dissociation in Clinical and Nonclinical Samples

Abstract: Research has consistently found elevated mean dissociation scores in particular diagnostic groups. In this study, we explored whether mean dissociation scores for different diagnostic groups resulted from uniform distributions of scores within the group or were a function of the proportion of highly dissociative patients that the diagnostic group contained. A total of 1566 subjects who were psychiatric patients, neurological patients, normal adolescents, or normal adult subjects completed the Dissociative Expe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
132
8
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
10
132
8
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, in sample 1, we observed high percentages of students (i.e., 23-44%) scoring above the DES and DES-T cutoffs that are in use. In fact, these rates are implausibly high when one compares them to the prevalence of clinically significant dissociative symptoms in the general population, which have been estimated to be in the 5-29% range 13 . The percentage of sample 2 students who exceeded the cutoff on the CDS was considerably lower (i.e., 5%), but still well above prevalence rates of Depersonalisation Disorder, the most common dissociative disorder, which epidemiological studies estimate at 1.9% in the general population 22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, in sample 1, we observed high percentages of students (i.e., 23-44%) scoring above the DES and DES-T cutoffs that are in use. In fact, these rates are implausibly high when one compares them to the prevalence of clinically significant dissociative symptoms in the general population, which have been estimated to be in the 5-29% range 13 . The percentage of sample 2 students who exceeded the cutoff on the CDS was considerably lower (i.e., 5%), but still well above prevalence rates of Depersonalisation Disorder, the most common dissociative disorder, which epidemiological studies estimate at 1.9% in the general population 22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scores are averaged across items to obtain a total DES score (range: 0-100), with higher DES scores indicating a higher frequency of dissociative experiences. Values above 20 12 or 30 13 are considered to be indicative of clinically relevant dissociation.…”
Section: Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dissociative phenomena are not unique to dissociative disorders, but may also occur in acute stress disorder (Spiegel et al 1996;Morgan et al 2001), post-traumatic stress disorder (Boon & Draijer, 1993), and eating disorders (Vanderlinden et al 1993 a). In addition, dissociative experiences are common in the general population (Ross et al 1990 ;Vanderlinden et al 1991;Kihlstrom et al 1994 ;Putnam et al 1996). The aetiology of dissociative phenomena is insufficiently known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although scores of dissociation in schizophrenia are higher than in healthy people they are lower than in other psychiatric disorders (borderline personality disorder, dissociative disorders) (Putnam et al, 1996). On top of that, in dissociative disorders, qualitatively in comparison to schizophrenia, there is a maintained reality testing and the positive psychotic symptoms are better demarcated from stressful experiences like anxiety or intra-psychic tension.…”
Section: Dissociation Splitting and Metacognitionmentioning
confidence: 89%