2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.05.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patients with poor baseline walking capacity are most likely to improve their functional status with multimodal prehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
87
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Those participants with high levels of comorbidities and poor fitness were often not eligible to be included, which suggests those people most in need to improve physical function were less likely to receive prehabilitation. The multi‐modality approach of prehabilitation could optimise the management of cancer patients with low baseline scores and who have been shown to gain greater benefits (Minnella et al, ). Rather than trying to demonstrate the efficacy of multi‐modality prehabilitation on the fittest patients, we should consider using the approach to optimise the management of the more complex and least fit cancer patients who have most to gain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those participants with high levels of comorbidities and poor fitness were often not eligible to be included, which suggests those people most in need to improve physical function were less likely to receive prehabilitation. The multi‐modality approach of prehabilitation could optimise the management of cancer patients with low baseline scores and who have been shown to gain greater benefits (Minnella et al, ). Rather than trying to demonstrate the efficacy of multi‐modality prehabilitation on the fittest patients, we should consider using the approach to optimise the management of the more complex and least fit cancer patients who have most to gain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those participants with high levels of comorbidities and poor fitness were often not eligible to be included, which suggests those people most in need to improve physical function were less likely to receive prehabilitation. The multi-modality approach of prehabilitation could optimise the management of cancer patients with low baseline scores and who have been shown to gain greater benefits (Minnella et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The American Cancer Society has published a broad exercise guideline that recommends at least 150 min of moderate or 75 min of vigorous intensity (or combination of) exercise per week and includes 2−3 sessions of resistance training, involving major muscle groups [21]. For example, a certified kinesiologist assessed and trained each participant to perform home-based training, consisting of aerobic, resistance and flexibility exercise up to 50 min three times per week [22,23]. For aerobic exercise, cycling, walking, or swimming is used based on the physical capacity of each patient, assessed using the 6-min walking test distance.…”
Section: Preoperative Exercise Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a registered dietician estimates macronutrient and energy intake from each patient's food record, and discusses dietary goals with each patient. Patients can be provided protein supplementation to reach a daily intake of up to 1.2 g of protein/kg of body weight, as per the European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition guidelines for surgical patients [22][23][24]. Protein supplement is recommended to be ingested within 1 h post exercise (anabolic window).…”
Section: Nutritional Prehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation