2000
Patients, Physicians, and E-mail
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
5
1
0
0
Citation Types
0
5
0
0
Year Published
2000
2014
Publication Types
Select...
5
1
Relationship
0
6
Authors
Journals
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
References 5 publications
0
5
0
0
“…[16][17][18][19] Our study found no e-mail that required urgent attention. Nevertheless, before being offered physicians' e-mail addresses, patients should be made aware of what defines appropriate content and what can be expected for a reply time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19] Our study found no e-mail that required urgent attention. Nevertheless, before being offered physicians' e-mail addresses, patients should be made aware of what defines appropriate content and what can be expected for a reply time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In letter to the editor of the Archives of Dermatology a physician wrote in response to our call to establish guidelines [2]: "The appropriate resolution for the majority of unsolicited mail is the same as for unsolicited email: the wastebasket/delete button. Do not offer advice to someone you personally have not seen physically, touched and examined in real time" [24]. …”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we think that physicians have an ethical obligation not only to do no harm, but - if possible - to do good and to protect the patient, as has been pointed out in the following letter reply [25]:…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients can now send electronic mail (e-mail) to providers to request simple actions such as prescription refills. The prevalence of e-mail is such that authors are now advising clinicians about coping with e-mail from patients (Lewis, 2000). In the future, patients will likely demand more of these relatively effortless and low-cost communications with clinicians.…”
Section: Internetmentioning
confidence: 99%
