2014
DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient preference with respect to QoL and reduction in opioid‐induced constipation ( OIC ) after treatment with prolonged‐release ( PR ) oxycodone/naloxone compared with previous analgesic therapy [ PREFER study]

Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was to assess patient preference in terms of quality of life (QoL), analgesia and bowel function for patients with moderate to severe chronic non-malignant pain, when treated with oxycodone PR/naloxone PR compared with the previous WHO-step I and/or WHO-step II analgesic treatment . Study design: This was a 3-week open-label phase 3b study conducted in Belgium and the Netherlands, after 3 weeks patients could enter an extension phase. Patient preference with respect to QoL for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are supported by PREFER, a 3‐week, open‐label study investigating patient preference for opioid therapy. Of 169 patients (62% had low back pain), OXN PR improved QoL measures, with most marked gains in individuals with OIC who were previously treated with WHO step II analgesics; greater patient preference for OXN PR compared with prior opioid analgesic therapy was also reported …”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are supported by PREFER, a 3‐week, open‐label study investigating patient preference for opioid therapy. Of 169 patients (62% had low back pain), OXN PR improved QoL measures, with most marked gains in individuals with OIC who were previously treated with WHO step II analgesics; greater patient preference for OXN PR compared with prior opioid analgesic therapy was also reported …”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 41 Furthermore, patients previously treated with non-opioids or weak opioids indicated their preference for oxycodone/naloxone treatment with respect to quality of life outcomes. 42 Direct and indirect treatment costs for oxycodone/naloxone were also ~13% lower compared to other strong opioids for chronic low back pain patients in Germany; the cost-effectiveness analysis indicates better health economic benefits for oxycodone/naloxone. 37 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The current trial was also the first study to compare patient preference for a prescription treatment for OIC with an OTC laxative and demonstrate alignment of preference with clinical outcomes. Protocols using preference scales similar to those in the current study have been used in previous OIC studies, as well as studies of other symptomatic conditions (e.g., migraine headaches) (11,12). In a previous study that compared the prescription OIC treatment lubiprostone with the OTC laxative senna, both treatments were associated with improvements in OIC-related symptoms and quality of life, but no significant differences were observed between lubiprostone and the OTC laxative in clinically evaluated measures (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary end point—patient-reported preference for naloxegol or PEG 3350—was assessed at the end of the second treatment period using a graded, 7-point, symmetrical scale (strong, moderate, or slight preference for naloxegol; no preference; slight, moderate, or strong preference for PEG 3350). Similar measures have been used in previous OIC studies and for other symptomatic conditions (e.g., migraine headaches) (11,12). For analysis purposes, responses were collapsed into 3 preference categories: prefer naloxegol, no preference, and prefer PEG 3350.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%