Purpose
Image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is designed to ensure accurate and precise targeting, but whether improved clinical outcomes result is unknown.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective comparison of locally advanced lung cancer patients treated with and without IGRT from 2001-2012 was conducted. Median local failure-free survival (LFFS), regional, locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS), distant failure-free survival (DFFS), progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were estimated. Univariate and multivariate models assessed the association between patient and treatment-related covariates and local failure.
Results
169 patients were treated with definitive radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy with a median follow-up of 48 months in the IGRT cohort and 96 months in the non-IGRT cohort. IGRT was utilized in 36% (62 patients) of patients. OS was similar between cohorts (2-year OS, 47% vs. 49%, p=0.63). The IGRT cohort had improved two year LFFS (80% vs. 64%, p=0.013) and LRFS (75% and 62%, p=0.04). Univariate analysis revealed IGRT and treatment year improved LFFS while group stage, dose, and PET/CT planning had no impact. IGRT remained significant in the multivariate model with an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 0.40 (p=0.01). DFFS (58% vs. 59%, p=0.67) did not differ significantly.
Conclusion
IGRT with daily CBCT confers an improvement in the therapeutic ratio relative to patients treated without this technology.