2009
DOI: 10.1080/01900690903135934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path Shifting and Path Dependence: Labor Market Policy Reforms Under German Federalism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the discussion showed that it provided an interesting reference point. (IOM, 2008b, p. 30, emphasis added) Indeed, Knuth's (2009) analysis of the Hartz Reforms, which attempted a unified provision of labour market support, also suggest that path shifting is more likely to be successful than path breaking within these environments.…”
Section: Case 1: One-stop-shops (Osss) For Migrant Guidance and Integmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, the discussion showed that it provided an interesting reference point. (IOM, 2008b, p. 30, emphasis added) Indeed, Knuth's (2009) analysis of the Hartz Reforms, which attempted a unified provision of labour market support, also suggest that path shifting is more likely to be successful than path breaking within these environments.…”
Section: Case 1: One-stop-shops (Osss) For Migrant Guidance and Integmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Up to this time, the German labour market had suffered for years from high and persistent unemployment, and the unemployment and social assistance system was ineffective and inefficient (Fleckenstein, ). Starting in 2002, the government modified the existing active labour market policies, invented new instruments and consolidated the unemployment and social assistance system into a new means‐tested welfare benefit system for former social assistance recipients and the long‐term unemployed (Knuth, ). Since then, the German activation strategy has involved strengthened job‐search requirements, individual action plans, financial sanctions, and different ALMPs such as in‐firm training and job creation schemes, including the €1‐jobs as the most important programme in quantitative terms.…”
Section: The Institutional Context In Germanymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On en doute dans la mesure où la réforme ne met pas fin à la variété des minimums sociaux et n'instaure pas, selon les informations disponibles, d'obligation stricte pour les béné-ficiaires de recherche un emploi. Cette réforme a accru la part de la logique béveridgienne du système français, déjà présente à ses origines (Barbier et Théret, 2001) (Knuth, 2008), parce qu'auparavant, les assurés ayant épuisé leurs droits continuaient à percevoir une prestation d'assistance, mais proportionnelle à leur précédent revenu (Arbeitslosenhilfe). Parallèlement, depuis le milieu des années 1990, une logique de flexibilisation des contrats de travail est couplée avec la réforme, qui voit s'accroître considérablement le rôle des emplois précédemment dénommés « †marginaux †» (geringfügige Arbeit, évalués à plus de 7 millions d'emplois en 2008).…”
Section: Annexe 1 Les Expériences Nationalesunclassified