2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-005-0271-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pastes for electromagnetic interference shielding

Abstract: A paste has been developed for electromagnetic interference shielding by mixing stainless steel fibers (8-µm diameter) and graphite flakes (5 µm) in a water-based graphite colloid (containing submicron graphite flakes and a binder) in a volume ratio 0.5:20:100. The resulting coating of thickness 0.1-0.2 mm after drying exhibits shielding effectiveness of 34 dB at 1 GHz, primarily due to reflection. The paste is superior to those containing graphite flakes or carbon filaments (0.1-µm diameter), due to the highe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is higher than the value of 34 dB at 1 GHz previously reported for a coating of similar thickness but in the form of a water-based dispersion comprising discontinuous stainless steel fiber (8 lm diameter), 5 lm graphite flake, and submicron graphite flake. 32 Without the steel fiber in the dispersion, the shielding effectiveness is only 28 dB. The effectiveness of the steel fiber is attributed mainly to its small diameter (the skin effect), although the large aspect ratio of the fiber may help the electrical connectivity and the limited magnetic character of the steel may help the shielding through absorption.…”
Section: As Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This value is higher than the value of 34 dB at 1 GHz previously reported for a coating of similar thickness but in the form of a water-based dispersion comprising discontinuous stainless steel fiber (8 lm diameter), 5 lm graphite flake, and submicron graphite flake. 32 Without the steel fiber in the dispersion, the shielding effectiveness is only 28 dB. The effectiveness of the steel fiber is attributed mainly to its small diameter (the skin effect), although the large aspect ratio of the fiber may help the electrical connectivity and the limited magnetic character of the steel may help the shielding through absorption.…”
Section: As Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference 32 uses water as the vehicle, whereas this work uses a polymer as the vehicle. A water-based dispersion 32 has the advantage of the evaporation of the water from the coating after coating application causing an increased degree of direct contact between the conductive fiber and flake. However, in spite of the small amount of binder in a water-based dispersion, the coating is mechanically weak and the adhesion of the coating is also relatively weak, compared to the polymer-based coating of this work.…”
Section: As Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon materials have been intensively investigated as electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding materials [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Colloidal graphite has been applied in shielding pastes [2], and conductive carbon black has shown good characteristics in composite radar absorbing structures [3] and in rubbers composites at high content [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colloidal graphite has been applied in shielding pastes [2], and conductive carbon black has shown good characteristics in composite radar absorbing structures [3] and in rubbers composites at high content [4]. Recently multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) have attracted a lot of attention from the viewpoint of their potential application as EMI shielding additives to polymers due to their high shielding characteristics at low contents [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta aplicación está aumentando en interés en la sociedad actual debido al creciente uso de dispositivos electrónicos que se ven afectados por las radiaciones ambientales, especialmente por la radiación de radiofrecuencias. Durante los últimos años, el uso de tecnologías inalámbricas ha aumentado significativamente, siendo necesario proteger de este tipo de radiaciones algunos edificios, instalaciones o habitaciones, por ejemplo, en hospitales, edificios militares o gubernamentales, estaciones eléctricas o instalaciones estratégicas (2)(3)(4).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified