2006
DOI: 10.1049/ip-cta:20045223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passivity-based integral control of a boost converter for large-signal stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
42
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The PBC theory offers a systematical method for system passivation, which is successfully applied to controlling many kinds of converters, including buck, boost, buck-boost and three-phase DC-AC VSCs [13,15,[21][22][23]. However, these approaches concentrate on the passivity seeking between the control input and output but not the one with respect to external input and output, required by the interface passivity.…”
Section: Preliminarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PBC theory offers a systematical method for system passivation, which is successfully applied to controlling many kinds of converters, including buck, boost, buck-boost and three-phase DC-AC VSCs [13,15,[21][22][23]. However, these approaches concentrate on the passivity seeking between the control input and output but not the one with respect to external input and output, required by the interface passivity.…”
Section: Preliminarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a unit-amplitude sawtooth PWM, the duty-cycle d(t)=t on /(t on + t off ) is the control input of the converter. As shown in (Erickson & Maksimovic, 1999) and (Leyva et al, 2006), considering that the state-space matrices of the converter are [ A on , B on ]d u r i n gt on and [ A off , B off ]d u r i n gt off , the general state-space averaged model of a dc-dc converter can be written as:…”
Section: Model Of the Buck Convertermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early approaches such as passivity based control and Lyapunov based control have been considered in [25][26][27]. These methods have shown to be more robust to large signals disturbances but their performances cannot be compared to the standard techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%