2018
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passengers and drivers of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities at different scales

Abstract: This article is a Commentary on Neuenkamp et al., 220: 1236–1247 and Van Geel et al., 220: 1262–1272.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further research, ideally on more than one site, is needed for a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of the spatiotemporal assembly of soil microbes at small scales by assessing and linking functions of bacteria and fungi with plant traits. Likewise, and within the frame of an emerging discussion as to whether AM fungal communities are more structured by the abiotic or biotic environment (Hempel, ), future studies should incorporate balanced consideration of environmental variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further research, ideally on more than one site, is needed for a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of the spatiotemporal assembly of soil microbes at small scales by assessing and linking functions of bacteria and fungi with plant traits. Likewise, and within the frame of an emerging discussion as to whether AM fungal communities are more structured by the abiotic or biotic environment (Hempel, ), future studies should incorporate balanced consideration of environmental variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conflicting results have been observed, however, regarding the interactions between plant community composition and AMF communities, ranging from enhanced (Wu et al ., ; Hiiesalu et al ., ) to reduced plant diversity in the presence of AMF (Antoninka et al ., ) to no relationship between plant and AMF diversity (Öpik et al ., ). These contradictory findings may be related in part to study scales (Hempel, ), since different environmental forces work at different scales (Chase, ); this also applies to AMF (Vályi et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, we argue that plant and AM fungal communities may respond cooperatively to grassland extreme drought. This inconsistency could be caused by the experimental setup and the spatial and temperal scale of the research (Vályi et al 2016;Hempel 2018). Previously, plant-AM fungi interaction studies usually control one partner to investigate its effect on the other, which neglected dynamic community changes in both partners, and which may thus not be applicable to predict climate-driven community dynamics in natural ecosystems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the main drivers behind AM fungal community patterns were in some cases mostly spatial, in others mostly environmental (edaphic and/or climatic), and in others biotic (host plant or non‐AM fungi‐related) (Caruso, ; in this issue of New Phytologist , pp. 954–956; Hempel, , pp. 952–953).…”
Section: Mycorrhizal Fungal Community Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questions around the causality behind correlations in plant–fungi–soil systems are increasingly popular, but driver–passenger relationships in mycorrhizal symbiosis remain elusive (Hempel, , pp. 952–953).…”
Section: Mycorrhizal Fungal Community Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%