2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40747-020-00252-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle swarm optimization algorithm for the optimization of rescue task allocation with uncertain time constraints

Abstract: This paper focuses on the problem of robot rescue task allocation, in which multiple robots and a global optimal algorithm are employed to plan the rescue task allocation. Accordingly, a modified particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, referred to as task allocation PSO (TAPSO), is proposed. Candidate assignment solutions are represented as particles and evolved using an evolutionary process. The proposed TAPSO method is characterized by a flexible assignment decoding scheme to avoid the generation of unf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although PSO is relatively simple to apply and has a high convergence rate, it is easy to fall into local optimum and premature convergence. In the past few years, many improved PSO algorithms have been proposed to improve the search capability of the PSO algorithm and reduce the probability of PSO falling into a local optimum [19][20][21][22][40][41][42]. As an important parameter of PSO, the improvement of inertia weight can greatly improve the performance of PSO.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although PSO is relatively simple to apply and has a high convergence rate, it is easy to fall into local optimum and premature convergence. In the past few years, many improved PSO algorithms have been proposed to improve the search capability of the PSO algorithm and reduce the probability of PSO falling into a local optimum [19][20][21][22][40][41][42]. As an important parameter of PSO, the improvement of inertia weight can greatly improve the performance of PSO.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state of the art algorithms tradeoff optimality for reduced algorithmic complexity. Several centralized approaches that use particle swarm optimization [11], [12] and genetic algorithms [13]- [15] have been developed to solve MRTA. However, they require the agents continuously communicate to a central server that solves the planning problem and then sends the instructions back.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the quality of the solutions found by the heuristic, we compare their results with the optimal solution of the MILP. Furthermore, we compare the heuristic with two meta-heuristics: the Genetic Algorithm (GA) [13] and the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) [14]. It is possible to improve QoS levels by making the most efficient use of available resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%