Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering IX 2018
DOI: 10.1201/9781351003629-48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle-based modelling of cortical meshes for soil retaining applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference determines an incorrect characterization of the mesh mechanical behaviour, which, if not duly considered, may negatively reflect on the performance of the mesh system. While the implementation of an ''in situ'' test set-up may be difficult to achieve (an example of large-scale test can be found in [5]), the use of a numerical approach allows this problem to be overcome [22,37,41].…”
Section: Effect Of the Size Of The Punching Elementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This difference determines an incorrect characterization of the mesh mechanical behaviour, which, if not duly considered, may negatively reflect on the performance of the mesh system. While the implementation of an ''in situ'' test set-up may be difficult to achieve (an example of large-scale test can be found in [5]), the use of a numerical approach allows this problem to be overcome [22,37,41].…”
Section: Effect Of the Size Of The Punching Elementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, the realization of real-scale experiments [4,5] is complex and extremely costly. On the other hand, the laboratory tests that are currently used to evaluate the performance of the mesh do not correctly reproduce conditions in the field [5,22,24,41]. In the laboratory characterization, the mesh panel is generally fixed to a rigid frame along its outer boundary, instead in the field the mesh is only locally fixed by means of anchor plates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From a numerical perspective, both the finite element method (FEM) [20][21][22][23][24][25] and the discrete element method (DEM) [26][27][28][29][30] have been adopted to simulate mesh structures. Focusing on anchored drapery systems only, the DEM has been recently used to analyze its interaction with a single rigid body (i.e., rock block) [18,19,[31][32][33][34] or with an unstable granular layer [18,[35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of the increasing usage of this system due to its low cost and ease of installation, recent studies have aimed to investigate the most appropriate design method [8][9][10], either with numerical methods [11][12][13][14] or with real-scale tests [15][16][17][18]. The scientific literature also includes numerical studies on the net component only [19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%