Nursing Research Using Participatory Action Research 2014
DOI: 10.1891/9780826126146.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participatory Action Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of our studies employed either a community-based participatory research approach [ 9 , 10 , 24 , 25 ] or had authors which were members of the respective communities [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 32 ]. These methods allow for the engagement of community members to leverage expertise of Indigenous knowledge holders to address community concerns [ 56 ] and ensure a balance between research and action benefiting the community and science [ 67 , 68 ]. It is important to note that the small number of studies obtained for this review are reflective of individual beliefs, community-specific health risks and concepts of physical activity and can only be generalized with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of our studies employed either a community-based participatory research approach [ 9 , 10 , 24 , 25 ] or had authors which were members of the respective communities [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 32 ]. These methods allow for the engagement of community members to leverage expertise of Indigenous knowledge holders to address community concerns [ 56 ] and ensure a balance between research and action benefiting the community and science [ 67 , 68 ]. It is important to note that the small number of studies obtained for this review are reflective of individual beliefs, community-specific health risks and concepts of physical activity and can only be generalized with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in the past, research and health models focused on “outside-expert” approaches, it is now being acknowledged that these approaches are poorly suited to facilitate the improved health and well-being status amongst Indigenous communities [ 34 , 104 , 105 ]. Methods such as the CBPR allow for the inclusion of guidance from community representatives at every stage, break down the barriers between researchers and participants, and ensure cultural relevance [ 48 , 103 ]. Other studies examining the on-the-land activities and the impacts on Indigenous youth, their families, and communities stressed the importance of working with Indigenous communities to incorporate the localized strengths and resources of the Indigenous communities themselves [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-eyed seeing approach stresses the importance of viewing through both the mainstream western and Indigenous worldviews for the greater good of everyone [ 45 , 46 , 47 ]. Community-based participatory research is “a practical approach to problem solving through planning, action and reflection” addressing social problems [ 34 , 48 ] and recognizing communities as a unit of identity, to build on their strengths and resources [ 48 ]. Using the complementary approaches, such as the two-eyed seeing approach and CBPR, to better understand health and well-being allowed for the inclusion of the diverse perspectives and experiences of community members.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not all PAR is anti‐oppressive. Currently PAR enjoys great popularity within some academic communities (especially in the social sciences over the last two decades; Breda, , p. 2). The trend of putting the terms “participatory” and “action” before “research” has led to co‐option: not every project labelled PAR is “participatory” research (in the sense that the objects of knowledge are admitted to actually co‐shape the research process, develop the research questions, choose a methodology) or “action” research (in the sense that the knowledge created in the research process is not made to be acted on by participants; Potts & Brown, , p. 281).…”
Section: Messy Situations With Diverse Knowledgesmentioning
confidence: 99%