2006
DOI: 10.3171/jns.2006.105.1.119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participation of an abnormality in the transforming growth factor–β signaling pathway in resistance of malignant glioma cells to growth inhibition induced by that factor

Abstract: These results suggest that the ability to resist TGFbeta-mediated growth inhibition in malignant glioma cells is due to abnormalities in the TGFbeta signaling pathway.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
23
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in contrast to normal EC cells, which demonstrated nuclear targeting of pSMAD2 after TGFb1 stimulation, nuclear pSMAD2 positivity was barely detectable in KRJ-I cells (<7%). These data suggest that TGFb1-mediated signal transduction in a small intestinal carcinoid cell line, as in glioma cell lines, 54 is blocked at the level of SMAD nuclear translocation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in contrast to normal EC cells, which demonstrated nuclear targeting of pSMAD2 after TGFb1 stimulation, nuclear pSMAD2 positivity was barely detectable in KRJ-I cells (<7%). These data suggest that TGFb1-mediated signal transduction in a small intestinal carcinoid cell line, as in glioma cell lines, 54 is blocked at the level of SMAD nuclear translocation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…P21 WAF1/CIP1 expression levels are increased in cell lines treated with TGFb1 that have intact TGFb1-mediated cytostatic pathways, 58,59 and may be unaltered in glioma cell lines that have lost this responsiveness. 54 In the current study, p21 WAF1/CIP1 transcription and protein was decreased. KRJ-I cells express time-dependent increases in both transcript and protein expression of c-Myc in response to TGFb1 treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…EI24, a p53-target gene, was lost in invasive breast cancers, and knockdown of EI24 conferred resistance to etoposide treatment in breast cancer cells [51]. SMAD2 expression is lower in glioma cells than in normal astrocytes [52]. Similarly, two genes (EPHX1 and BRD7) are promising targets of miR-10a*.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…После фосфорилирования белки Smad2,3 формируют гетеромерные комплексы c Smad4, затем мигрируют из цитоплазмы в ядро, где совместно с транскрипционными коактиваторами/корепрессорами (Ski, Sno) регулируют транскрипцию таргетных генов. Smad7 предотвращает TGFb-сигналинг, ингибируя фосфорилирование Smad2,3 [60,61].…”
Section: Tgfb-сигналингunclassified
“…Показано, что экспрессия белков Smad2 и особенно Smad3, а также уровень фосфорилированного Smad2, были значительно ниже в клеточных линиях глиомы по сравнению с другими линиями опухолевых клеток (А549, карцинома лёгкого) или нормальными астроцитами, при этом TGFb-сигналинг не влиял на экспрессию Sno, p21, p15, циклина D1 или CDK4 [61].…”
Section: Tgfb-сигналингunclassified