2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partially sulfurated ultrathin nickel-iron carbonate hydroxides nanosheet boosting the oxygen evolution reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 % with respect to Cu. The relative amount of sulfate with respect to the total amount of S significantly increased during OER operation, up to a 70 % of the total detected sulfur 42,66.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 % with respect to Cu. The relative amount of sulfate with respect to the total amount of S significantly increased during OER operation, up to a 70 % of the total detected sulfur 42,66.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure b shows the FTIR spectra of NiCo-CH and NiCo-CHS. The peaks with high intensity at 3420–3500 cm –1 are attributed to the O–H stretching vibration of molecular water and the hydrogen-bonded O–H groups, and the peak at 1629 cm –1 is due to the bending mode of water molecules. , The bands observed at 1500, 829, 754, and 693 cm –1 in these two spectra correspond well to the stretching vibration modes of ν­(OCO 2 ), δ­(CO 3 ), δ­(OCO), and ρ­(OCO), respectively. Meanwhile, the shoulder vibration band present at 1382 cm –1 is also assigned to the carbonate anions. , The peaks existing at 1106 and 623 cm –1 in the spectrum for NiCo-CHS are attributed to the CoS and possible M–S stretching vibrations, respectively. ,, The band at 954 cm –1 in the spectra for both NiCo-CH and NiCo-CHS is ascribed to the δ­(M–OH) bending modes, , while the band at 529 cm –1 could be assigned to ν­(M–O) stretching vibrations …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The OER mechanism in alkaline media is usually considered as the following processes: (1) M + OH → M–OH + e – ; (2) M–OH + OH → M–O + e – + H 2 O; (3) M–O + OH → M–OOH + e – ; (4) M–OOH + OH → M–O 2 + H 2 O + e – ; (5) M–O 2 → M + O 2 ; M in the equation refers to the active sites. , There are going to be various intermediates in the OER process, such as MOH, M–O, M–OOH, and M–O 2 . Finally, the O 2 + M (gas) are obtained, and the true activity sites in the reaction are metal oxide/hydr­(oxy)­oxides . The OER kinetics is related to the adsorption energy of OH – on the surface of the catalyst .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%