2008
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.78.032101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial separability and entanglement criteria for multiqubit quantum states

Abstract: We explore the subtle relationships between partial separability and entanglement of subsystems in multiqubit quantum states and give experimentally accessible conditions that distinguish between various classes and levels of partial separability in a hierarchical order. These conditions take the form of bounds on the correlations of locally orthogonal observables. Violations of such inequalities give strong sufficient criteria for various forms of partial inseparability and multiqubit entanglement. The streng… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
192
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
192
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is thus important to make both classifications of entangled states: into admitting and not admitting local realistic models, and into violating and not violating a given Bell inequality. Entanglement and Bell violation of different noisy states has already been studied by several authors [20][21][22][23][24]. All this indicates that entanglement and impossibility of a local hidden variable model are not only different concepts, but also truly different resources [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus important to make both classifications of entangled states: into admitting and not admitting local realistic models, and into violating and not violating a given Bell inequality. Entanglement and Bell violation of different noisy states has already been studied by several authors [20][21][22][23][24]. All this indicates that entanglement and impossibility of a local hidden variable model are not only different concepts, but also truly different resources [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that genuine many-body entanglement is known to be essential, e.g., in achieving extreme spin squeezing [39], and also high sensitivity in some general metrology tasks [42]. For well-calibrated or trusted [43] measurement devices, there exist few criteria [39][40][41][42][44][45][46][47][48]] to certify such many-body entanglement. For example, an entanglement depth larger than 28 was recently demonstrated [48] using such a witness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they can be easily determined from the expectation values of local observables [31,[33][34][35], as we see below. To determine the off-diagonal and diagonal elements that appear in the expression (5) we present local observables in terms of Pauli operators [17].…”
Section: Experimental Feasibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The separability condition which is given in terms of density matrix elements is found useful in detecting genuine multipartite entanglement and nonseparability of multipartite states [27,28,31]. Inspired by this, we derive our k-separability condition by using the density matrix elements.…”
Section: Counts On Partitions Of K-separable N -Partite Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%