Lake City, UT (S.P.E.); on behalf of the SAMIS investigators The online-only Data Supplement is available at http://circep.ahajournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.112.972620/-/DC1. Correspondence to Shubhayan Sanatani, MD, Children's Heart Centre, British Columbia Children's Hospital, 1F9, 4480 Oak St, Vancouver, Canada V6H 3V4. E-mail ssanatani@cw.bc.ca Background-Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is one of the most common conditions requiring emergent cardiac care in children, yet its management has never been subjected to a randomized controlled clinical trial. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the 2 most commonly used medications for antiarrhythmic prophylaxis of SVT in infants: digoxin and propranolol. Methods and Results-This was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of infants <4 months with SVT (atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia or atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia), excluding Wolff-Parkinson-White, comparing digoxin with propranolol. The primary end point was recurrence of SVT requiring medical intervention. Time to recurrence and adverse events were secondary outcomes. Sixty-one patients completed the study, 27 randomized to digoxin and 34 to propranolol. SVT recurred in 19% of patients on digoxin and 31% of patients on propranolol (P=0.25).No first recurrence occurred after 110 days of treatment. The 6-month recurrence-free status was 79% for patients on digoxin and 67% for patients on propranolol (P=0.34), and there were no first recurrences in either group between 6 and 12 months. There were no deaths and no serious adverse events related to study medication. Conclusions-There was no difference in SVT recurrence in infants treated with digoxin versus propranolol. The current standard practice may be treating infants longer than required and indicates the need for a placebo-controlled trial. Clinical Trial Registration Information-http://clinicaltrials.gov; NCT-
Sanatani et al Treating Supraventricular Tachycardia in Infants 985during infancy. [8][9][10] As many as 50% of infants presenting with SVT have severe cardiomyopathy and heart failure because of unrecognized tachycardia. [2][3][4]11 Heart failure may progress to cardiovascular collapse and is the genesis of the associated 1% to 4% mortality. 2,5,[12][13][14] Due to concerns for morbidity and mortality and the challenges in detecting SVT in infants, 4,15 the general consensus among pediatric cardiologists who manage these patients has been to use medication to prevent recurrent SVT. In the context of this study, the term prophylaxis refers to the prevention of recurrent episodes of SVT. In a recent survey of pediatric cardiologists and electrophysiologists, Wong et al 16 reported that 98% of respondents recommend prophylactic medication when presented with a hypothetical case of an infant with SVT.
Editorial see p 882 Clinical Perspective on p 991There are no randomized controlled trials addressing the most effective medicine for preventing recurrent SVT. The 2 most commo...