2000
DOI: 10.1590/s0036-46652000000100009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parasitological and immunological diagnoses of strongyloidiasis in immunocompromised and non-immunocompromised children at Uberlândia, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil

Abstract: SUMMARYParasitological and immunological diagnoses were part of a study conducted among 151 children, 83 immunocompromised (IC) and 68 non-immunocompromised (non-IC) aged from zero to 12, seen at

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
12

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
14
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Detection of parasite-specific antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT) and enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) may be a useful complement to the parasitological diagnosis of strongyloidiasis (Conway et al 1993a, Costa-Cruz et al 1997, De Paula et al 2000, but such tests show cross-reactivity with filaria, schistosomes, hookworm, Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura and Echinococcus (Gam et al 1987, Conway et al 1993a,b, Lindo et al 1994. Western blotting (WB) tests have been applied with more specificity in the immunodiagnosis of strongyloidiasis (Genta et al 1988, Sato et al 1990, Atkins et al 1999, Uparanukraw et al 1999.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection of parasite-specific antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT) and enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) may be a useful complement to the parasitological diagnosis of strongyloidiasis (Conway et al 1993a, Costa-Cruz et al 1997, De Paula et al 2000, but such tests show cross-reactivity with filaria, schistosomes, hookworm, Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura and Echinococcus (Gam et al 1987, Conway et al 1993a,b, Lindo et al 1994. Western blotting (WB) tests have been applied with more specificity in the immunodiagnosis of strongyloidiasis (Genta et al 1988, Sato et al 1990, Atkins et al 1999, Uparanukraw et al 1999.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por ello, se nota un incremento en el desarrollo de estudios que buscan la posibilidad de un estudio serológico, básicamente mediante la técnica de ELISA, que en los últimos años ha alcanzado preferencia de los investigadores debido a su metodología sencilla y que no demanda gran sofisticación de equipos. Por eso decidimos revisar aquellos trabajos que comparaban la técnica de ELISA con los demás métodos parasitológicos ( [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] ).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Various factors can influence S. stercoralis prevalence, including the integrity of immunity, socioeconomic status, sanitary and hygiene conditions of individuals, the level of heat and humidity, which affect parasite development in soil [27, 28], and the laboratory methods used for diagnosis [29, 30]. The prevalence of strongyloidiasis in a population can be divided into three categories: sporadic (<1%), endemic (1–5%), and hyperendemic (>5%) [31].…”
Section: Epidemiology Of Strongyloidiasis and Association With Alcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ELISAs are the most widely used immunodiagnostic methods and have shown sensitivities and specificities above 70.0%, depending on the screened antigen and antibody isotype [101104]. However, because of difficulties in the production and the standardization of antigens capable of providing reproducible results, the use of ELISAs remains limited [30]. Uncertainties regarding positive reactions may occur in cases of hidden strongyloidiasis (i.e., low parasite burdens), immunological memory of past infections, or the presence of similar antigens among helminths [104].…”
Section: S Stercoralis Diagnosis and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%