Parasitic Diseases

Gerhold, Richard W.

doi:10.1002/9781118911075.ch6

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…43 Zudem trifft den Familienrichter nun gemäß § 26 FamFG -anders als nach dem früheren Verfahren -ebenso wie den Strafrichter die Pflicht zur Amtsermittlung. 44 45 Beschreitet der Antragsgegner diese Wege nicht, ist er an den Inhalt der Schutzanordnung gebunden und wichtiger noch, der Antragsteller darf sich auf den gewährten Schutz verlassen! 46 Keinesfalls darf sich der Antragsgegner damit verteidigen können, er habe die rechtskräftige Schutzanordnung für rechtswidrig gehalten und sich daher über ihren Inhalt hinwegsetzen dürfen.…”

Section: Vereinbarkeit Mit Dem Wortlaut Des § 4 Satz 1 Gewschgunclassified

Kurzbeitrag: Zur Zivilrechtsakzessorietät des § 4 Satz 1 GewSchG unter besonderer Berücksichtigung völkerrechtlicher Verträge

Gerhold¹

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Vereinbarkeit Mit Dem Wortlaut Des § 4 Satz 1 Gewschgunclassified

Kurzbeitrag: Zur Zivilrechtsakzessorietät des § 4 Satz 1 GewSchG unter besonderer Berücksichtigung völkerrechtlicher Verträge

Gerhold¹

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reasons for evaluation on an emergency basis of and short-term outcomes for chickens from backyard flocks: 78 cases (2014–2017)

Vaught

Gladden

Rozanski

et al. 2019

javma

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE To investigate the reasons for evaluation on an emergency basis of and short-term outcomes for chickens from backyard flocks. DESIGN Retrospective case series. ANIMALS 78 chickens. PROCEDURES For chickens evaluated on an emergency basis at a New England veterinary teaching hospital in January 2014 through March 2017, information including age, sex, flock size, primary medical problem, final diagnosis, and immediate outcome was obtained from electronic medical records. Primary medical problems were classified as abnormal droppings, crop or gastrointestinal tract disease, lameness, neurologic disease, nonspecific signs (ie, undefined illness), respiratory tract disease, reproductive tract disease, and trauma. RESULTS 78 chickens were evaluated on an emergency basis, of which 71 were females from small flocks. The median age of the chickens was 1 year (range, 0.1 to 7 years). The most common problem was trauma (n = 25), followed by nonspecific signs (11) and reproductive tract disease (10); 18 birds had neurologic disease (6), lameness (6), or gastrointestinal tract disease (6). Five birds had respiratory tract disease, and 3 had abnormal droppings. Six birds were brought to the emergency service for euthanasia only. Trauma, reproductive tract disease, and signs of Marek disease were most frequently identified in birds that were fully evaluated. Thirty-five (45%) chickens were discharged from the hospital. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results indicated that backyard flock chickens were evaluated on an emergency basis most commonly because of trauma and reproductive tract disease. Although approximately half of the evaluated chickens were euthanized, the remainder were discharged from the hospital and required medical management. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2019;254:1196–1203)

show abstract

Parasitic Diseases

Cited by 2 publications

References 18 publications

Kurzbeitrag: Zur Zivilrechtsakzessorietät des § 4 Satz 1 GewSchG unter besonderer Berücksichtigung völkerrechtlicher Verträge

Kurzbeitrag: Zur Zivilrechtsakzessorietät des § 4 Satz 1 GewSchG unter besonderer Berücksichtigung völkerrechtlicher Verträge

Reasons for evaluation on an emergency basis of and short-term outcomes for chickens from backyard flocks: 78 cases (2014–2017)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About