2012
Paranormal and Religious Believers Are More Prone to Illusory Face Perception than Skeptics and Non‐believers
Abstract: SummaryIllusory face perception, a tendency to find human‐like faces where none are actually present in, for example, artifacts or scenery, is a common phenomenon that occasionally enters the public eye. We used two tests (N = 47) to analyze the relationship between paranormal and religious beliefs and illusory face perception. In a detection task, the participants detected face‐like features from pictures of scenery and landscapes with and without face‐like areas and, in a rating task, evaluated the face‐like…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
67
18
17
4
Citation Types
11
84
2
0
Year Published
2013
2026
Publication Types
Select...
78
7
3
2
Relationship
1
89
Authors
Journals
Cited by 90 publications
(97 citation statements)
References 31 publications
11
84
2
0
“…Similarly, in Study 1B religiosity significantly predicted perceived face‐likeness of stimulus images, F (1, 92) = 13.48, p < .001, and the standardized slope was statistically significant from zero, β = 0.36, t (92) = 3.67, p < .001, yielding a medium‐sized effect, r = .36; R 2 = .13. These results suggest that the religious participants were more prone to perceive a face in everyday objects than less‐religious participants, which is consistent with a past finding (Riekki et al, ). Given that the pattern of results from the Japanese sample (Study 1A) was similar to that of the American sample (Study 1B), the association between religiosity and the anthropomorphism of everyday objects might be universal.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Similarly, in Study 1B religiosity significantly predicted perceived face‐likeness of stimulus images, F (1, 92) = 13.48, p < .001, and the standardized slope was statistically significant from zero, β = 0.36, t (92) = 3.67, p < .001, yielding a medium‐sized effect, r = .36; R 2 = .13. These results suggest that the religious participants were more prone to perceive a face in everyday objects than less‐religious participants, which is consistent with a past finding (Riekki et al, ). Given that the pattern of results from the Japanese sample (Study 1A) was similar to that of the American sample (Study 1B), the association between religiosity and the anthropomorphism of everyday objects might be universal.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Study 1 showed the association between religiosity and the anthropomorphism of everyday objects, and the results were consistent with those of a previous study (Riekki et al, ). Indeed, another study reported no relationship between religiosity (specifically, belief in God) and anthropomorphism (Willard & Norenzayan, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Also, personal differences play a significant role in paranormal beliefs. These results support the effects of learning and culture on the paranormal beliefs in other studies (Riekki, 2013;Lindeman & Svedholm 2012). Therefore, studying the socio-cultural effects on supernatural beliefs can be helpful.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In line with our expectations and previous studies 30 , 31 , greater paranormal belief endorsement was found to be associated with an increased tendency to perceive patterns when there are none (false alarm rate), a more liberal response criterion and a decreased perceptual sensitivity—independent of image category or base rate. Furthermore, paranormal beliefs were not associated with a diminished miss rate—which one might expect in the case of a generally increased yes-say tendency—suggesting that this effect is selective for the perception of illusory patterns, and that the more liberal response criterion stems from the increased tendency to produce false alarms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
