1993
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.10.001611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric representation of Stiles–Crawford functions: normal variation of peak location and directionality

Abstract: Evidence suggests that the psychophysically determined Stiles-Crawford effect of the first kind (SCE) reflects waveguide properties of human photoreceptors. The peak of the SCE data set is assumed to reflect the principal alignment tendencies, and the spread (e.g., rho value, the curvature or width at half-height) is assumed to reflect the directionality (i.e., interreceptor differences in alignment) of the population of photoreceptors being tested. As such, disruption of the normal SCE can be used and/or has … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
117
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(28 reference statements)
7
117
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Stiles-Crawford effect is difficult to account for accurately when the area of the retina stimulated is not restricted to the fovea [36] and when the entry pupil location for peak maximum sensitivity is not known [37].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Stiles-Crawford effect is difficult to account for accurately when the area of the retina stimulated is not restricted to the fovea [36] and when the entry pupil location for peak maximum sensitivity is not known [37].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Ref. 13). The differences between reflectometric and psychophysical are still more marked at higher eccentricities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, due to the limitations of our modeling software we were not able to include such effects. As the aberrations incorporated into the present model appear to be less than those considered problematic by Vohnsen and, moreover, all previous experiments had been conducted using SCE neutralizing filters mounted in the pupil plane of the eye, 22,[27][28][29][30]33 we considered this approach to be reasonable. Nonetheless, readers should be aware, that the impact of the SCE on DoF in the presence of higher magnitudes of spherical aberration may differ slightly from those indicated here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was incorporated into the model by modifying the transmission function: instead of being a uniformly lit pupil it was set to be a Gaussian apodized pupil with a SCE factor 22 of 0.12 mm -2 (this value is an estimate derived from psychophysically conducted measurements).…”
Section: Modeling Stiles-crawford Effect (Sce)mentioning
confidence: 99%