2006
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-24-3185-2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter estimation using the genetic algorithm and its impact on quantitative precipitation forecast

Abstract: Abstract. In this study, optimal parameter estimations are performed for both physical and computational parameters in a mesoscale meteorological model, and their impacts on the quantitative precipitation forecasting (QPF) are assessed for a heavy rainfall case occurred at the Korean Peninsula in June 2005. Experiments are carried out using the PSU/NCAR MM5 model and the genetic algorithm (GA) for two parameters: the reduction rate of the convective available potential energy in the Kain-Fritsch (KF) scheme fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a random search technique effectively probes the whole parameter space to minimize a given cost function (Khorasheh et al, 1999;Moles et al, 2003) and this includes genetic algorithms (Lee et al, 2006;Paterakis et al, 1998). In this study, we have developed a new parameter estimation method, a pseudo-random search algorithm (PRSA), as one of such random search techniques.…”
Section: Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a random search technique effectively probes the whole parameter space to minimize a given cost function (Khorasheh et al, 1999;Moles et al, 2003) and this includes genetic algorithms (Lee et al, 2006;Paterakis et al, 1998). In this study, we have developed a new parameter estimation method, a pseudo-random search algorithm (PRSA), as one of such random search techniques.…”
Section: Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods have been increasingly applied to parameter optimizations in various hydrological models (Bastani et al, 2010;Bulatewicz et al, 2009;Uddameri and Kuchanur, 2007) and to those in numerical weather predictions (Fang et al, 2009;Krishnakumar, 1989;Lee et al, 2006;Yu et al, 2013). Micro-GA applied to this study is an improved version of GA with smaller generation sizes and simplified genetic modifications, hence efficiently reducing the computational resources (Krishnakumar, 1989;Reeves, 1993;Wang et al, 2010).…”
Section: Micro-gamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where H is the number of hits, F and O are the numbers of samples in which the precipitation amounts are greater than the specified threshold in forecast and observation, respectively, and R is the expected number of hits in a random forecast R = FO/N, where N is the total number of points being verified (Hamill 1999;Lee et al 2006;Yang and Tung 2003). Here ETS = 1 means a perfect forecast while ETS = 0 indicates that the forecast is same as a random forecast.…”
Section: Fitness Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementation of a GA system does not require domain-specific (e.g., meteorological in this study) information for the coding and decoding process. Lee et al (2006) optimized both a physical and a computational parameter in MM5 using a standard GA to improve the quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) in a heavy rainfall case in Korea. Our study will focus on optimal parameter estimation in a CP scheme to improve the QPF in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model using a micro-GA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%