2001
DOI: 10.1002/1099-0682(200103)2001:3<707::aid-ejic707>3.3.co;2-q
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Paramagnetic Bis(amidinate) Iron(II) Complexes and their Diamagnetic Dicarbonyl Derivatives
Abstract: Paramagnetic bis(amidinate) iron(II) complexes and their diamagnetic dicarbonyl derivatives Vendemiati, B.
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
5
5
5
0
Citation Types
1
18
0
0
Year Published
Range
2001
20012013
2013Publication Types
Select...
12
Relationship
1
11
Authors
Journals
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
References 9 publications
1
18
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This fragment contains π-bonds conjugated through the pyrrole-oxalyl fragment (see Scheme , 3 ), terminating in an acyl carbon bound to iron (Fe1–C29 = 1.948(3) Å). The two unfunctionalized bound CO molecules display C–O bond lengths of 1.144(3) and 1.150(3) Å, similar to lengths seen for other low-spin Fe 2+ dicarbonyl complexes reported in the literature …”
supporting
confidence: 81%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This fragment contains π-bonds conjugated through the pyrrole-oxalyl fragment (see Scheme , 3 ), terminating in an acyl carbon bound to iron (Fe1–C29 = 1.948(3) Å). The two unfunctionalized bound CO molecules display C–O bond lengths of 1.144(3) and 1.150(3) Å, similar to lengths seen for other low-spin Fe 2+ dicarbonyl complexes reported in the literature …”
supporting
confidence: 81%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In contrast to 1a , complex 1b does not react with CO under identical conditions. Bis(aminoamidinate) complex 2 also does not react with CO under the applied conditions, whereas the homoleptic amidinate complexes [ t BuC(NR) 2 ] 2 Fe (R = Cy, i Pr) react with CO only to give the bis(carbonyl) adducts [ t BuC(NR) 2 ] 2 Fe(CO) 2 without subsequent CO insertion . This is also the case for the dinuclear amidinate complex {[μ-1,2-[NC(Ph)NSiMe 3 ] 2 - c -C 6 H 10 ]Fe} 2 …”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In this case, the solid-state structure seems to be highly different from the symmetric geometry present in solution, where free rotation about the M−N axis because of low sterical hindrance is possible. In summary, differences in the C−N bond lengths in the single-crystal structure greater than 1.8 pm as well as differences between the M−N bond lengths greater than 5 pm suggest an unsymmetrically bonded chelate complex present in solution, leading to separated isopropyl signals in the NMR spectrum. ,, Note that N , N ′-diisopropyl[2,6-bis(mesityl)]benzamidine can be considered as an example of a rare monodentate amidinato complex with M−N and C−N differences of 132.7 and 5.2 pm, respectively.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 94%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This fragment contains π-bonds conjugated through the pyrrole-oxalyl fragment (see Scheme , 3 ), terminating in an acyl carbon bound to iron (Fe1–C29 = 1.948(3) Å). The two unfunctionalized bound CO molecules display C–O bond lengths of 1.144(3) and 1.150(3) Å, similar to lengths seen for other low-spin Fe 2+ dicarbonyl complexes reported in the literature …”
supporting
confidence: 81%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In contrast to 1a , complex 1b does not react with CO under identical conditions. Bis(aminoamidinate) complex 2 also does not react with CO under the applied conditions, whereas the homoleptic amidinate complexes [ t BuC(NR) 2 ] 2 Fe (R = Cy, i Pr) react with CO only to give the bis(carbonyl) adducts [ t BuC(NR) 2 ] 2 Fe(CO) 2 without subsequent CO insertion . This is also the case for the dinuclear amidinate complex {[μ-1,2-[NC(Ph)NSiMe 3 ] 2 - c -C 6 H 10 ]Fe} 2 …”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In this case, the solid-state structure seems to be highly different from the symmetric geometry present in solution, where free rotation about the M−N axis because of low sterical hindrance is possible. In summary, differences in the C−N bond lengths in the single-crystal structure greater than 1.8 pm as well as differences between the M−N bond lengths greater than 5 pm suggest an unsymmetrically bonded chelate complex present in solution, leading to separated isopropyl signals in the NMR spectrum. ,, Note that N , N ′-diisopropyl[2,6-bis(mesityl)]benzamidine can be considered as an example of a rare monodentate amidinato complex with M−N and C−N differences of 132.7 and 5.2 pm, respectively.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 94%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This fragment contains π-bonds conjugated through the pyrrole-oxalyl fragment (see Scheme , 3 ), terminating in an acyl carbon bound to iron (Fe1–C29 = 1.948(3) Å). The two unfunctionalized bound CO molecules display C–O bond lengths of 1.144(3) and 1.150(3) Å, similar to lengths seen for other low-spin Fe 2+ dicarbonyl complexes reported in the literature …”
supporting
confidence: 81%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In contrast to 1a , complex 1b does not react with CO under identical conditions. Bis(aminoamidinate) complex 2 also does not react with CO under the applied conditions, whereas the homoleptic amidinate complexes [ t BuC(NR) 2 ] 2 Fe (R = Cy, i Pr) react with CO only to give the bis(carbonyl) adducts [ t BuC(NR) 2 ] 2 Fe(CO) 2 without subsequent CO insertion . This is also the case for the dinuclear amidinate complex {[μ-1,2-[NC(Ph)NSiMe 3 ] 2 - c -C 6 H 10 ]Fe} 2 …”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In this case, the solid-state structure seems to be highly different from the symmetric geometry present in solution, where free rotation about the M−N axis because of low sterical hindrance is possible. In summary, differences in the C−N bond lengths in the single-crystal structure greater than 1.8 pm as well as differences between the M−N bond lengths greater than 5 pm suggest an unsymmetrically bonded chelate complex present in solution, leading to separated isopropyl signals in the NMR spectrum. ,, Note that N , N ′-diisopropyl[2,6-bis(mesityl)]benzamidine can be considered as an example of a rare monodentate amidinato complex with M−N and C−N differences of 132.7 and 5.2 pm, respectively.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 94%