1991
DOI: 10.1056/nejm199109193251201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paracentesis with Intravenous Infusion of Albumin as Compared with Peritoneovenous Shunting in Cirrhosis with Refractory Ascites

Abstract: The LeVeen shunt and paracentesis are equally effective in relieving refractory ascites. The former may provide better long-term control of ascites, but shunt occlusion is common and survival is not improved.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
94
0
6

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 279 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
94
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…56 Peritoneovenous shunt, e.g., LeVeen or Denver, was popularized in the 1970s as a physiologic treatment of ascites. Shunt placement has been shown in controlled trials to decrease the duration of hospitalization, to decrease the number of hospitalizations, and to decrease the dose of diuretics 36,57 ; however, poor long-term patency, excessive complications, and no survival advantage compared with medical therapy in controlled trials have led to near abandonment of this procedure. 36,57 Shunt-related fibrous adhesions, and even ''cocoon'' formation, can make subsequent liver transplantation difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…56 Peritoneovenous shunt, e.g., LeVeen or Denver, was popularized in the 1970s as a physiologic treatment of ascites. Shunt placement has been shown in controlled trials to decrease the duration of hospitalization, to decrease the number of hospitalizations, and to decrease the dose of diuretics 36,57 ; however, poor long-term patency, excessive complications, and no survival advantage compared with medical therapy in controlled trials have led to near abandonment of this procedure. 36,57 Shunt-related fibrous adhesions, and even ''cocoon'' formation, can make subsequent liver transplantation difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shunt placement has been shown in controlled trials to decrease the duration of hospitalization, to decrease the number of hospitalizations, and to decrease the dose of diuretics 36,57 ; however, poor long-term patency, excessive complications, and no survival advantage compared with medical therapy in controlled trials have led to near abandonment of this procedure. 36,57 Shunt-related fibrous adhesions, and even ''cocoon'' formation, can make subsequent liver transplantation difficult. 58 Peritoneovenous shunting should probably now be reserved for diuretic-resistant patients who are not transplant candidates and who are not candidates for serial therapeutic paracenteses because of multiple abdominal surgical scars or distance from a physician who is willing and capable of performing paracenteses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 Attempts to control an intractable lymphocele using multiple surgical procedures was eventually achieved with use of a Denver shunt (Care Fusion, Waukegan, IL) . 10 However, peritoneovenous shunts are prone to blockage and disseminated intravascular coagulation and may pose an infectious risk in the immunocompromised patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os "shunts" peritoneo-venosos (LeVeen or Denver) ou os "shunts" portosistêmicos cirúrgicos têm indicações muito limitadas, até mesmo para os pacientes com ascite refratária. Vários problemas, como a manutenção da permeabilidade do cateter, o número excessivo de complicações, sem vantagens na sobrevida em comparação com a terapêutica clínica, têm levado ao progressivo abandono do uso deste tipo de shunt 68 . O uso do TIPS tem ganhado espaço no tratamento das ascites refratárias (Evidência grau A).…”
Section: Opções Cirúrgicasunclassified