1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0879(199606)3:2<86::aid-cpp91>3.0.co;2-3
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Panic Management, Trazodone and a Combination of Both in the Treatment of Panic Disorder
Abstract: Background—The aim of the study was to assess the short‐term efficacy of panic management, trazodone and a combination of both in the treatment of panic disorder. In none of the treatments exposure in vivo instructions were given. Method—Patients were diagnosed using DSM‐III‐R criteria for panic disorder. A randomly assigned, comparative design was used in which patients were their own controls. Fifty‐two of 60 outpatients who entered the study, completed the 6‐week baseline and 6‐week active treatment period.…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
6
3
0
0
Citation Types
0
4
0
0
Year Published
2006
2018
Publication Types
Select...
8
1
Relationship
0
9
Authors
Journals
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
References 0 publications
0
4
0
0
“…A total of 67 studies met the inclusion criteria for this meta‐analysis. Selected characteristics of the included studies are reported in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 67 studies met the inclusion criteria for this meta‐analysis. Selected characteristics of the included studies are reported in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow chart describing the inclusion process, including the reasons for exclusion, is presented in Figure . A total of 52 studies met inclusion criteria for this meta‐analysis . Selected characteristics of the included studies are reported in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to validity, all but four comparisons from three trials (Mavissakalian & Michelson, 1986; Wiborg & Dahl, 1996; Berger et al , 2004) scored B for allocation concealment. In total, 19 studies conducted blinded outcome assessments and four studies were unblinded (Mavissakalian et al , 1983; Spinhoven et al , 1996; Azhar, 2000; Berger et al , 2004). The interrater reliability of these two validity criteria was 94% for allocation concealment and 83% for outcome assessment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
