Pandemic-Related Disruption and Positive Adaptation: Profiles of Family Function at the Onset of the Pandemic

Abstract

The onset of the pandemic brought heightened stress to parents due to disruptions to family life, in addition to processes of positive family adaptation, including greater closeness, more time spent together, and shared problem-solving. Delineating how early pandemic-related family stress and positive adaptation simultaneously operate is important for understanding risk and resilience. We use a person-oriented approach to identify subgroups of caregivers based on patterns of stress and positive adaptation in the first months of the pandemic. Data come from a multi-national study of 549 caregivers (68% female) of 1098 children (younger child: M = 9.62, SD = 3.21; older child: M = 11.80, SD = 3.32). In May 2020, caregivers reported on stress (income, family, and pandemic-specific) and positive adaptation using previously validated scales, and covariates indexing family vulnerabilities (i.e., caregiver adverse childhood experiences, caregiver and child mental health) and psychosocial resources (caregiver social support, positive coping, religiosity/spirituality, and benevolent childhood experiences, and pre-pandemic socioeconomic resources). A latent profile analysis was conducted using the four indicators. Profiles were examined in relation to covariates using BCH procedures. A 4-profile solution was selected, characterized by Low Disruption ( n = 296), Multi-Domain Disruption ( n = 36), Income Disruption ( n = 111), and Family Disruption ( n = 106) groups. Positive adaptation minimally differentiated profiles. Participants in the Low Disruption group reported more resources and fewer vulnerabilities than other groups. Those in the Multi-Domain Disruption group reported the fewest resources and the most vulnerabilities. Early in the pandemic, a minority group of individuals in this sample carried a disproportionate burden of pandemic-related stress. Potential consequences to family functioning and implications for systemic family prevention and intervention efforts are discussed. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42844-022-00077-7.

Obesity-related parenting practices, styles, and family functioning: A natural experiment comparing pandemic and nonpandemic data.

“…Family functioning, which refers to how families manage daily routines, fulfill roles, communicate, and connect emotionally (Halliday et al, 2014), may moderate the pandemic’s impact on parenting practices because parents’ actions are influenced by the characteristics of the family system. Family functioning could have protective effects for families in stressful times; meaning that parents from high family functioning households may be better equipped to navigate disruptions related to the pandemic (e.g., becoming stronger in relational terms, getting closer, making meaning, and raising hope; Prime et al, 2022). Indeed, a systematic review on family functioning highlights its connection with parenting for the health of the family and children (Halliday et al, 2014).…”

Building family resilience in the wake of a global pandemic: Looking back to prepare for the future.

“…However, the disruption emanating from the pandemic was not equally distributed. In one study using a multinational sample of over 500 parents of children ages 5–18 years old, it was a small but significant cluster of parents who reported high levels of stress across each of the financial, family, and pandemic-specific domains (Prime et al, 2022). These parents represented a vulnerable group, reporting higher levels of caregiver and child mental health problems, less social support and positive coping, more socioeconomic hardship, and a history of adversity in their own childhoods, as compared to groups that reported high levels of stress in only one or two domains.…”

Pandemic distress associated with segregation and social stressors

“…Additionally, having a stronger sense of social status in one's community can reflect greater social capital, allowing for better community connectedness and more effective coping with challenges. Both social support and social status can be important protective factors against COVID-19 related adversity (20,(39)(40)(41)(42)(43).…”