2002
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-002-0820-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pan-European Study on Culture-Proven Legionnaires' Disease: Distribution of Legionella pneumophila Serogroups and Monoclonal Subgroups

Abstract: This pan-European study included unrelated strains of Legionella pneumophila obtained from 1335 cases of Legionnaires' disease. The isolates were serotyped into the serogroups 1 to 15 by monoclonal antibodies (MAb) and/or rabbit antisera. Additionally, MAb subgrouping was undertaken for isolates belonging to serogroups 1, 4, and 5. Monoclonal types of serogroup 1 were subdivided as having, or not having, the virulence-associated epitope recognized by the MAb 3/1 (Dresden Panel). This epitope is not present on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
74
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) revealed more heterogeneity in L. pneumophila, and nine phenons reacting with different MAbs have been defined within SG1 (12). A vast majority of clinical SG1 isolates are MAb3/1 positive, but this type is significantly less frequently isolated from environmental samples (7,8,10,12,13). The introduction of molecular methods enabled a further refinement of the classification of representatives of L. pneumophila.…”
Section: Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) revealed more heterogeneity in L. pneumophila, and nine phenons reacting with different MAbs have been defined within SG1 (12). A vast majority of clinical SG1 isolates are MAb3/1 positive, but this type is significantly less frequently isolated from environmental samples (7,8,10,12,13). The introduction of molecular methods enabled a further refinement of the classification of representatives of L. pneumophila.…”
Section: Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some strains of the L. pneumophila sg 1 population have an enhanced ability to cause disease: the clinical predominance of L. pneumophila sg 1 strains with specific genotypes suggests that they have the ability to cause infections in humans [28, 29, 14]. Among the L. pneumophila sg 1 strains, some monoclonal subgroups (Knoxville, Philadelphia, Benidorm, France/Allentown) display the virulence-associated epitope recognised by MAb 3/1; these strains seem to be associated with hospital outbreaks, travel-associated infections or community-acquired infections [26, 10]. There are some published data [10, 13, 14, 30, 31] on the serogroup and monoclonal subgroup distribution of L. pneumophila in man-made water systems that are associated or not associated with human disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the L. pneumophila sg 1 strains, some monoclonal subgroups (Knoxville, Philadelphia, Benidorm, France/Allentown) display the virulence-associated epitope recognised by MAb 3/1; these strains seem to be associated with hospital outbreaks, travel-associated infections or community-acquired infections [26, 10]. There are some published data [10, 13, 14, 30, 31] on the serogroup and monoclonal subgroup distribution of L. pneumophila in man-made water systems that are associated or not associated with human disease. This paper describes the first Italian study in which information about the environmental distribution of strains according to their MAb 3/1 profile has been examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 is the major causative agent associated with both community-and hospitalacquired legionellosis (85% versus 5% due to other serogroups) (Helbig et al 2002;Doleans et al 2004;Rota et al 2006;Stout et al 2007), although the diagnosis of Legionella spp. infection is mainly based on urinary antigen detection, which only detects L. pneumophila sg 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%