1999
DOI: 10.1029/1998jb900099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleointensity variations across the last geomagnetic reversal at La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Local investigations of paleomagnetic field strength indicate low values for mid-Miocene rocks from the Canaries, approximately half of the present day field intensity (Leonhardt et al 2000;Leonhardt and Soffel 2002) and values in the range of the present day field around the last polarity reversal, the 0.78 Ma Matuyama/Brunhes transition (Valet et al 1999). Such a geomagnetic field intensity difference between the Miocene and the Pleistocene is found globally (Juá rez et al 1998;Selkin and Tauxe 2000;Shcherbakov et al 2002;Heller et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Local investigations of paleomagnetic field strength indicate low values for mid-Miocene rocks from the Canaries, approximately half of the present day field intensity (Leonhardt et al 2000;Leonhardt and Soffel 2002) and values in the range of the present day field around the last polarity reversal, the 0.78 Ma Matuyama/Brunhes transition (Valet et al 1999). Such a geomagnetic field intensity difference between the Miocene and the Pleistocene is found globally (Juá rez et al 1998;Selkin and Tauxe 2000;Shcherbakov et al 2002;Heller et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…There is now a general agreement among the paleomagnetic community that intensity drops significantly compared to the stable field during the large departures of the geomagnetic field from the axial dipole position (Laj and Channell, 2007). It has also been observed that polarity transitions is first expressed in the intensity record than in the directional one (Valet et al, 1999;Prévot et al, 1985a, b;Riisager et al, 2000). No systematic intensity drops are related, however, to the pre and post transitional regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The non-dipole field is given by the harmonic contributions from 2 to 6. reversal, where the north magnetic pole moved toward the Southern geographic pole reaching the present normal polarity. This feature has been deeply studied becoming the best documented past geomagnetic event in the basis of the huge density of paleomagnetic data recording this polarity transition (see Valet et al, 1999 for a review). During the last decade, these paleomagnetic data have been used to model the behavior of the geomagnetic field during this transition (Leonhardt and Fabian, 2007) or to constrain the geodynamo numerical simulations (e.g., Aubert et al, 2008) pointing out different scenarios for the precedent phase of a geomagnetic reversal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, according to other studies (Hartmann and Pacca, 2009;De Santis et al, 2013), the behavior of the SAA during the last centuries is related to the higher harmonic degrees n = 2 and 3, i.e., the quadrupole and octupole fields. This is an important issue because these non-dipolar contributions play an important role during the geomagnetic reversals that are characterized by high ratios between the non-dipolar over dipolar contribution (e.g., Valet et al, 1999). In this paper we have analyzed in more details how these both contributions, i.e., the dipolar (n = 1) and non-dipolar (n > 1), affect to the evolution of the SAA during the last two centuries.…”
Section: The Origin Of the Saa: A Case Study For The Last 200 Yearsmentioning
confidence: 99%