2021
DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pairwise likelihood estimation for confirmatory factor analysis models with categorical variables and data that are missing at random

Abstract: Methods for the treatment of item non‐response in attitudinal scales and in large‐scale assessments under the pairwise likelihood (PL) estimation framework and under a missing at random (MAR) mechanism are proposed. Under a full information likelihood estimation framework and MAR, ignorability of the missing data mechanism does not lead to biased estimates. However, this is not the case for pseudo‐likelihood approaches such as the PL. We develop and study the performance of three strategies for incorporating m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to further verify the construct validity of the COVID-19 BVS based on Sample 2 ( n = 539) ( 36 ). With reference to the recent simulation studies on the selection of CFA estimator, weighted least square mean and variance adjusted estimators (WLSMV) was used as the estimation method ( 38 , 39 ). We used several fit indices (and the respective cutoff criteria) to determine model fit: CFI > 0.950, RMSEA < 0.05, SRMR < 0.05 ( 40 43 ) as well as the χ 2 /df ≤ 3 ( 44 , 45 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to further verify the construct validity of the COVID-19 BVS based on Sample 2 ( n = 539) ( 36 ). With reference to the recent simulation studies on the selection of CFA estimator, weighted least square mean and variance adjusted estimators (WLSMV) was used as the estimation method ( 38 , 39 ). We used several fit indices (and the respective cutoff criteria) to determine model fit: CFI > 0.950, RMSEA < 0.05, SRMR < 0.05 ( 40 43 ) as well as the χ 2 /df ≤ 3 ( 44 , 45 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we review pairwise (maximum) likelihood (PML) estimation for IRT models [14][15][16][17]. For item responses X i with IRFs P i (x, θ; γ i ) (i = 1, .…”
Section: Pairwise Likelihood Estimation (Pml)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barendse and Rosseel (2020) estimated SEM with the PML estimation method for a mixture of binary and continuous data, by estimating Pearson, tetrachoric, polychoric, and polyserial correlations. Standard errors and missing‐data procedures for the PML estimation method have been developed by Katsikatsou et al (2012) and Katsikatsou and Moustaki (2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%