2009 3rd ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Networks-on-Chip 2009
DOI: 10.1109/nocs.2009.5071451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Packet-level static timing analysis for NoCs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to maintain high throughput and low latency, reducing network congestion with migrating some workload fro m busy links to idle lin ks is an effective solution. In [11], Krimer makes a packet-level static timing analysis to advise optimization decision. When mu ltiple flows share a same link, and the overall bandwidth requirement is beyond link's capacity.…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to maintain high throughput and low latency, reducing network congestion with migrating some workload fro m busy links to idle lin ks is an effective solution. In [11], Krimer makes a packet-level static timing analysis to advise optimization decision. When mu ltiple flows share a same link, and the overall bandwidth requirement is beyond link's capacity.…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 illustrates the delay evaluation of a heterogeneous NoC for two existing extreme analysis methodologies: single-VC [2,5,15,16] and "infinite-VCs", i.e. assuming that virtual channels are always available for any flow [6,12,1]. Single-VC based methodologies can result in higher latencies due to the over-estimation of path acquisition latencies (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works have presented analysis methodologies for NoCs with a single-VC [2,5,15,16], a uniform (same for all links) number of VCs [19,10,9,13] and "infinite" number of VCs [6,12,1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%